What is the difference between absolute and relative return objectives?

Question

AcadiFi · Accepted Answer

An absolute return objective specifies a stand-alone target return, such as 6 percent nominal or CPI plus 3 percent. A relative return objective specifies a target relative to a benchmark, such as S&P 500 plus 150 basis points or MSCI EAFE plus 200 bps.

Absolute objectives are appropriate for investors whose goals are anchored to real-world outcomes — funding retirement, meeting pension liabilities, preserving purchasing power. The investor cares about absolute outcomes, not relative performance.

Relative objectives suit institutional mandates where the portfolio manager is hired to add value versus a specific asset class benchmark, and where the investor has already made the strategic allocation decision elsewhere. Mutual funds, active equity managers, and long-only bond managers typically have relative objectives.

Example: sovereign wealth fund Aldenburg Heritage Investments articulates a compound IPS: at the total fund level, target CPI plus 4 percent (absolute). Within its equities allocation, target MSCI World plus 75 basis points (relative) for the active equity sleeve. This separates strategic (absolute) from tactical/manager (relative) expectations.

For hedge funds and alternatives, absolute return objectives dominate. For endowments using the Yale-style model, often both are used: overall fund targets CPI plus 5.5 percent, individual managers have benchmark plus alpha targets.

Tracking error is the natural risk metric for relative objectives; standard deviation or drawdown for absolute. The CFA Level III exam frequently tests identifying which is appropriate given client circumstances — individual investors generally have absolute objectives; pension plans have absolute (liability-relative) or relative depending on mandate structure.

What is the difference between absolute and relative return objectives?

Master Level III with our CFA Course

Related Questions

Practice Questions