How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
A real Reddit thread titled 'AUD 71 → 74 while working full-time in public tax. Passed REG & TCP earlier this year. Retaking in 10 days.' raised this CPA planning issue in a practical way. I want the exam-relevant version of the problem using the actual source signal instead of vague forum reassurance.\n\nSource context: I work full time in public accounting (tax/second year staff). Fall busy season absolutely wrecked my AUD study schedule, but earlier this year I passed REG in June and TCP in July (both 84s), so I know I’m capable. (Tax guy passes the tax exams, shocker lol.) AUD has been a diff
Unlock with Scholar — $19/month
Get full access to all Q&A answers, practice question explanations, and progress tracking.
No credit card required for free trial
Master Discipline Planning with our CPA Course
86 lessons · 160+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What changes when someone who passed FAR and REG moves into AUD and suddenly feels less prepared?
What does a realistic multi-section CPA plan look like when the total hour count gets much bigger than expected?
Should I choose TCP or ISC as my discipline if I am already starting with REG?
How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.