How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
A real Reddit thread titled 'Failed AUD with 61 after 150 hours of studying !' raised this CPA planning issue in a practical way. I want the exam-relevant version of the problem using the actual source signal instead of vague forum reassurance.\n\nSource context: Got an 89 on tcp and 92 on reg, felt good about my study methods with becker and it did not work out the same for aud. Retaking Aud next week so fingers crossed! Is it worth doing the SE exams? I have noticed that people do really get that becker bump. Any tips for passing? I hav
Unlock with Scholar — $19/month
Get full access to all Q&A answers, practice question explanations, and progress tracking.
No credit card required for free trial
Master Discipline Planning with our CPA Course
86 lessons · 160+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What changes when someone who passed FAR and REG moves into AUD and suddenly feels less prepared?
What does a realistic multi-section CPA plan look like when the total hour count gets much bigger than expected?
Should I choose TCP or ISC as my discipline if I am already starting with REG?
How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
How should I choose between TCP and ISC without letting forum hype make the decision for me?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.