How can I spot a ghost preparer problem on a client return?
I keep seeing exam explanations say taxpayers should avoid ghost preparers. In practice, what facts should make an EA slow down and investigate before relying on a prior-year return?
Look for a paid-preparer relationship that does not appear on the return. Red flags include no paid-preparer signature, no PTIN, a return marked or presented as self-prepared even though the taxpayer paid someone, no final return copy, pressure to sign a blank authorization, or a refund routed in a way the taxpayer did not understand.
None of those facts proves misconduct by itself. The EA should use them as a reason to gather more records:
- The complete filed return.
- Form 8879 or other e-file authorization.
- The account transcript and refund information.
- Proof of payment to the preparer.
- Communications showing what the taxpayer reviewed and approved.
For exam purposes, remember the taxpayer still has a duty to review the return before signing. The ghost-preparer issue helps identify complaint and evidence steps, but it does not remove the need to correct a materially inaccurate filing.
Master SEE Part 1 with our EA Course
195 lessons · 180+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Does paying income tax to one state automatically stop another state from taxing the same year?
Do I need an IP PIN to e-file a prior-year individual return?
Does paying my balance due automatically give me an extension to file?
Why can an underpayment penalty apply even after a large January estimated payment?
What should I do if a paper-filed return may have been mailed with errors?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.