How should I think about the test statistic instead of just memorizing the formula?
I can plug numbers into z or t formulas, but I still don't feel like I understand what the output number is telling me.
The test statistic tells you how far the sample result sits from the null-hypothesis value after adjusting for normal sampling noise.
In plain language, it answers:
"How surprising is this sample if the null world is the one we live in?"
Suppose fictional firm Mariner Pension Solutions expects mean client outflows of 4.0%. A sample comes in at 5.2% with a standard error of 0.4%.
The test statistic is:
(5.2 - 4.0) / 0.4 = 3.0
That means the sample is three standard errors away from the null value. A result that far out is usually difficult to explain as ordinary sampling variation alone.
Once you see the statistic as standardized distance, the formula becomes more intuitive:
- numerator = observed gap from the null
- denominator = normal variability of that estimate
Large absolute values mean stronger evidence against the null. Small absolute values mean the sample still looks fairly compatible with the null.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How do I map a CFA Ethics vignette to the right standard?
When does a duty to clients override pressure from an employer?
Do conflicts have to be disclosed before making a recommendation?
Why do CFA Ethics answers focus so much on the action taken?
What does a high-water mark actually do in a hedge fund fee calculation?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.