Should I use the IRS Single Life Expectancy table or a personalized mortality estimate when planning gifting horizons?
The lecture mentions using "house data" or life-expectancy estimates. For a real high-net-worth client, do you use the IRS unisex table or some personalized actuarial table?
For CFA exam purposes, default to the IRS Single Life Expectancy table. For real-world practice with HNW clients, use a personalized table from a licensed underwriter or actuary. Here's the framework.
IRS Single Life Expectancy Table (Publication 590-B):
- Unisex (combines male and female)
- US population average
- Updated every 2-5 years based on Social Security data
- Used for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts
- Default for any IRS-related planning calculation
Customizations a wealth advisor might apply:
Typical adjustments:
| Factor | Adjustment to baseline |
|---|---|
| Female (vs unisex) | $+3+5$ years |
| Male (vs unisex) | $-2-3$ years |
| Non-smoker | $+5+10$ years |
| Regular smoker | $-10-15$ years |
| Family longevity (90+) | $+3+7$ years |
| Family medical (heart disease, cancer, diabetes) | $-3-10$ years |
| Concierge medicine / private healthcare | $+3+5$ years |
| Very high BMI / metabolic syndrome | $-5-10$ years |
| Active lifestyle, low stress | $+2+5$ years |
| Sedentary, high stress | $-2-5$ years |
These are rough heuristics. A real actuary uses much more nuanced models.
Where each is appropriate:
- Exam questions: IRS unisex table, unless the vignette gives you a specific number.
- Annuity contract underwriting: insurance company's proprietary mortality table.
- Estate planning illustrations: advisor can use IRS or a personalized estimate — disclose the assumption.
- GRAT design: IRS Section 7520 rate (which is published monthly) and IRS life expectancy. Other tables are not allowed for tax purposes.
- Long-term care insurance: insurer-specific underwriting; varies dramatically.
A real-world example:
A 65-year-old non-smoking female with great family genes (mother lived to 95) and concierge medicine. IRS unisex table: 22.9 years remaining. Personalized estimate: 22.9 + 4 (female) + 5 (non-smoker, but baseline assumed non-smoker, so +0) + 5 (family longevity) + 4 (concierge medicine) = roughly 30-31 years.
Planning around 30 years of gifting instead of 23 years could move 50% more wealth tax-free across a generation. That's real money.
Caveat — IRS rules force IRS tables for tax purposes:
You can use a personalized estimate in your planning model, but the IRS won't accept it for the gift-tax valuation of a non-charitable interest in a GRAT. Section 7520 mandates the IRS table. So:
- For "what should we plan to gift" → use personalized
- For "how does the IRS value the gift" → use IRS Section 7520
These two layers can diverge by years, and aligning them is part of strategic planning.
Joint-life expectancy:
For a married couple, the relevant N is the time until BOTH spouses have died (second-to-die). The IRS publishes a Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table for this. Joint-life is meaningfully longer than either individual's expectancy:
| Both 65 | Joint life expectancy (second-to-die) |
|---|---|
| 65 + 65 | 25.5 years |
| 65 + 70 | 25.1 years |
| 70 + 70 | 21.8 years |
Married couples planning gifting strategies typically use joint-life expectancy, not individual.
Master Level III with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is my allocation effect NEGATIVE for a sector that had positive returns?
How do I identify the OPTIMAL sector decision in a Brinson attribution table?
What is the difference between Brinson-Hood-Beebower and Brinson-Fachler? Which is on the exam?
Why does the trust pay tax on income instead of the beneficiary?
How bad are the compressed trust tax brackets really? Show me the dollars.
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.