When do I need to amortise the excess purchase price under the equity method?
In the third lesson, the example shows amortising the excess attributed to plant and equipment over 10 years. Is amortisation required, or is it optional? And when does it not apply?
Amortisation of the excess purchase price is REQUIRED under both US GAAP (ASC 323) and IFRS (IAS 28), but only for the portion attributed to identifiable assets with finite useful lives. Goodwill and indefinite-life assets are NOT amortised.
The amortisation matrix:
| Excess attributed to: | Amortise? | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciable PP&E (machines, equipment) | YES, over remaining useful life | Matches the depreciation pattern of the underlying asset |
| Inventory | YES, when sold | Matches the cost flow when inventory leaves |
| Finite-life intangibles (patents, customer relationships) | YES, over useful life | Matches the consumption of the intangible |
| Land | NO | Land has indefinite life |
| Indefinite-life intangibles (brand names without contractual limit) | NO | Indefinite life |
| Goodwill | NO | Indefinite life by convention |
Worked example (matching the lecture):
Lucia pays $500K for 20% of William. William's book value of net assets is $1.2M. William's PP&E has with 10-year remaining life.
Step 1: (share of book value)
Step 2: $500K − $240K = $260K (excess)
Step 3: attributed to PP&E
Step 4: $260K − $60K = $200K goodwill (residual)
Annual amortisation: $60K / 10 years = $6,000/year
This $6,000 reduces equity income each year for 10 years.
Year-1 income statement impact (assuming William has $100K NI, $15K dividends):
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Share of William NI () | |
| Less: amortisation of excess on PP&E | |
| Equity income reported | +$14,000 |
Investment carrying value at year-end 1:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Beginning investment | $500,000 |
| Plus: share of NI | |
| Less: amortisation of excess | |
| Less: share of dividends () | |
| Ending carrying value | $511,000 |
After 10 years:
The $60K excess attributed to PP&E is fully amortised. From year 11 onwards, there's no more amortisation drag — equity income equals share of NI directly. The $200K goodwill remains forever in the investment account (subject to impairment).
What if PP&E useful life is uncertain?
The investor uses the same useful life that the investee uses. If the investee depreciates PP&E over 10 years, the investor amortises the $60K excess over 10 years too — consistent. If the investee changes its depreciation policy mid-life, the investor follows.
What if the investee sells the PP&E partway through?
Then the remaining unamortised excess must be recognised immediately as either a gain (if asset sold above book value reflecting the step-up) or a loss (if sold for less than implied step-up basis). Either way, the unamortised excess is removed from the investment account.
Exam pitfall:
Many candidates forget the amortisation step entirely and compute the investment carrying value as . The correct formula is:
That extra subtraction is the #1 missed calculation on equity-method exam questions.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is my allocation effect NEGATIVE for a sector that had positive returns?
How do I identify the OPTIMAL sector decision in a Brinson attribution table?
What is the difference between Brinson-Hood-Beebower and Brinson-Fachler? Which is on the exam?
Why does the trust pay tax on income instead of the beneficiary?
How bad are the compressed trust tax brackets really? Show me the dollars.
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.