Why does a benchmark need to be investable if it is only used for comparison?
If the benchmark return can be calculated, why does the CFA curriculum care whether the manager could actually invest in it?
Investability matters because a benchmark should represent a realistic passive alternative to the active strategy. If the benchmark cannot be held, replicated, or accessed under realistic conditions, it may not be a fair opportunity-cost comparison.
For example, a private-asset benchmark built from stale appraisals may be measurable, but it may not represent an investable portfolio with current transaction prices. Similarly, a benchmark containing securities outside the manager's legal or policy constraints can make the manager look too risky or too conservative for reasons unrelated to skill.
Measurable answers whether the return can be computed. Investable answers whether the comparison is economically meaningful.
Master Level III with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is my allocation effect NEGATIVE for a sector that had positive returns?
How do I identify the OPTIMAL sector decision in a Brinson attribution table?
What is the difference between Brinson-Hood-Beebower and Brinson-Fachler? Which is on the exam?
Why does the trust pay tax on income instead of the beneficiary?
How bad are the compressed trust tax brackets really? Show me the dollars.
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.