A
AcadiFi
IN
InvestmentBanker_NY2026-03-30
cfaLevel IEquity InvestmentsEquity Valuation

When should I use EV/EBITDA instead of P/E for equity valuation?

Both EV/EBITDA and P/E are price multiples, but my CFA study notes say they serve different purposes. When is one better than the other? Are there industries where one clearly dominates? I'd appreciate a practical framework for choosing between them.

143 upvotes
AcadiFi TeamVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

EV/EBITDA and P/E are both valuation multiples, but they measure different things and are appropriate in different situations.

Fundamental Difference:

  • P/E = Price per share / Earnings per share → equity value to equity holders' income
  • EV/EBITDA = Enterprise Value / EBITDA → total firm value (equity + debt - cash) to pre-interest, pre-tax, pre-depreciation earnings
Loading diagram...

Use P/E When:

  • Companies have similar capital structures (leverage levels)
  • Earnings are positive and relatively stable
  • Comparing equity-only returns to shareholders
  • The industry has low capital intensity (tech, services, consumer brands)

Use EV/EBITDA When:

  • Companies have different leverage levels — EV/EBITDA neutralizes the effect of debt because EBITDA is before interest
  • Earnings are negative but EBITDA is positive (common in turnarounds, high-growth firms)
  • Capital-intensive industries where depreciation policies distort P/E (telecom, utilities, airlines, real estate)
  • Cross-border comparisons where different tax regimes make net income incomparable
  • Evaluating takeover targets (acquirers buy the whole enterprise, not just equity)

Practical Framework:

ScenarioPreferred MultipleReason
Comparing Hawkins Telecom (D/E = 2.0) vs. Caldwell Wireless (D/E = 0.3)EV/EBITDADifferent leverage
Comparing two software companies with no debtP/ESimilar structure, low capex
Startup with $-5M net income but $3M EBITDAEV/EBITDANegative earnings
Utility companies with massive depreciationEV/EBITDAD&A distorts net income
Mature dividend payer like Procter & Gamble-type firmP/EStable positive earnings
M&A analysis for potential acquisitionEV/EBITDAValuing total enterprise

Industry Conventions:

  • Telecom / Infrastructure: EV/EBITDA (heavy depreciation, different leverage)
  • Banking / Financial: P/E (or P/B) — EBITDA is meaningless for financial firms because interest is an operating cost
  • Tech / SaaS: EV/Revenue or EV/EBITDA for pre-profit companies, P/E for profitable ones
  • Real Estate: P/FFO (Funds from Operations) — a REIT-specific variant

Key Limitation of EV/EBITDA: It ignores capex. Two companies with identical EBITDA but vastly different maintenance capex requirements are not equally valuable. This is why some analysts prefer EV/EBIT or EV/FCFF.

Exam tip: If the question mentions companies in the same industry but with different debt levels, EV/EBITDA is almost always the better choice. If the question mentions negative earnings, P/E is undefined and EV/EBITDA is the way to go.

Practice multiple selection scenarios in our CFA Level I question bank.

📊

Master Level I with our CFA Course

107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction

#ev-ebitda#pe-ratio#valuation-multiples#enterprise-value#comparables