Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
I keep getting confused by the Grinold–Kroner model for forecasting equity returns. I know it decomposes expected return into income, growth, and repricing components, but I can't seem to apply it correctly in practice questions. A numerical walkthrough would be incredibly helpful.
The Grinold–Kroner model breaks the expected return on equity into three intuitive building blocks:
E(R) = Income Return + Earnings Growth Return + Repricing Return
Or more precisely:
E(R) = (D/P − ΔS) + (i + g + Δ(P/E))
Where:
- D/P = Dividend yield
- ΔS = Expected change in shares outstanding (negative = buybacks, positive = dilution)
- i = Expected inflation
- g = Expected real earnings growth
- Δ(P/E) = Expected change in the P/E ratio (repricing)
Worked Example: Suppose you're forecasting returns for a broad US equity index:
| Component | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Current dividend yield (D/P) | 1.8% |
| Expected share buybacks (−ΔS) | +1.0% |
| Expected inflation (i) | 2.5% |
| Expected real earnings growth (g) | 2.0% |
| Expected P/E expansion Δ(P/E) | +0.5% |
Calculation:
- Income return = 1.8% + 1.0% = 2.8%
- Nominal earnings growth = 2.5% + 2.0% = 4.5%
- Repricing = 0.5%
- Total expected return = 2.8% + 4.5% + 0.5% = 7.8%
Common Pitfalls:
- Share buybacks are added, not subtracted. Buybacks reduce shares outstanding, so ΔS is negative and −ΔS is positive. This reflects that each remaining share claims a larger slice of earnings.
- Repricing is subjective. If you believe current valuations are stretched, you might assign a negative Δ(P/E), which drags down the expected return.
- Don't double-count inflation. Real growth (g) is already stripped of inflation, so you add inflation separately.
This model is testable in both item sets and constructed response on the CFA Level III exam. Practice decomposing different market scenarios into these three components.
For more practice with equity return models, check out our question bank for CFA Level III.
Master Level III with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.