A
AcadiFi
SC
SysRisk_Callum2026-04-04
frmPart IIOperational Risk

How is the G-SIB score calculated, and how does it determine the additional capital buffer a bank must hold?

I'm studying systemic risk regulation for FRM Part II. I know G-SIBs face additional capital requirements based on their systemic importance score, but I'm unclear on the five indicator categories, how the score is computed, and how banks get placed into buffer buckets. Can someone explain the full methodology?

108 upvotes
Verified ExpertVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

The G-SIB (Global Systemically Important Bank) assessment methodology uses a multi-indicator scoring system to identify banks whose failure would pose a threat to global financial stability. Higher scores result in larger capital surcharges.\n\nFive Indicator Categories (Equal Weight: 20% Each):\n\n| Category | Sub-Indicators | Weight per Sub-Indicator |\n|---|---|---|\n| Size | Total exposures (leverage ratio denominator) | 20.0% |\n| Interconnectedness | Intra-financial assets, intra-financial liabilities, securities outstanding | 6.67% each |\n| Substitutability | Payments activity, assets under custody, underwriting activity | 6.67% each |\n| Complexity | OTC derivatives notional, Level 3 assets, trading and AFS securities | 6.67% each |\n| Cross-jurisdictional activity | Cross-jurisdictional claims, cross-jurisdictional liabilities | 10.0% each |\n\nScore Calculation:\n\nFor each sub-indicator:\n\nBank's score = (Bank's value / Sum of all sample banks' values) x 10,000\n\nThe category score is the average of its sub-indicator scores. The overall G-SIB score is the sum of all five category scores.\n\nBuffer Buckets:\n\n| Bucket | Score Range | Additional CET1 Buffer |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 130-229 | 1.0% |\n| 2 | 230-329 | 1.5% |\n| 3 | 330-429 | 2.0% |\n| 4 | 430-529 | 2.5% |\n| 5 (empty) | 530+ | 3.5% |\n\nBucket 5 is intentionally kept empty to discourage banks from becoming even more systemically important. If a bank enters bucket 5, a new higher bucket is created.\n\nWorked Example:\nVanguard International Bank (hypothetical) calculates its G-SIB score:\n\n| Category | Bank Value | System Total | Score |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Size: Total exposures | $2.8T | $68T | (2.8/68) x 10,000 = 412 |\n| Interconnectedness (avg of 3) | — | — | 285 |\n| Substitutability (avg of 3) | — | — | 195 |\n| Complexity (avg of 3) | — | — | 340 |\n| Cross-jurisdictional (avg of 2) | — | — | 310 |\n\nWeighted scores (20% each):\n- Size: 412 x 0.20 = 82.4\n- Interconnectedness: 285 x 0.20 = 57.0\n- Substitutability: 195 x 0.20 = 39.0\n- Complexity: 340 x 0.20 = 68.0\n- Cross-jurisdictional: 310 x 0.20 = 62.0\n\nTotal G-SIB score: 82.4 + 57.0 + 39.0 + 68.0 + 62.0 = 308.4\n\nBucket allocation: Score 308 falls in bucket 2 (230-329), requiring an additional CET1 buffer of 1.5%.\n\nIf the bank has a minimum CET1 of 4.5%, plus capital conservation buffer of 2.5%, plus G-SIB surcharge of 1.5%, the total CET1 requirement becomes 8.5%.\n\nAdditional G-SIB Consequences:\n- Higher leverage ratio: 3% + 50% of G-SIB buffer = 3.75% for bucket 2\n- TLAC (Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity): minimum 18% of RWA + 6.75% of leverage exposure\n- Enhanced supervision and resolution planning requirements\n- Cross-border cooperation in resolution (single point of entry or multiple point of entry strategies)\n- Annual score recalculation with potential bucket migration\n\nThe FSB publishes the G-SIB list annually each November, with buffer requirements taking effect 14 months later.\n\nStudy systemic risk frameworks in our FRM Part II course.

🛡️

Master Part II with our FRM Course

64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction

#g-sib#systemic-risk#capital-buffer#bucket-allocation#fsb