A
AcadiFi
AD
AllocQuant_Daria2026-04-10
frmPart IMarket Risk

How do you use marginal VaR to evaluate the risk impact of adding a new position to an existing portfolio?

I understand that marginal VaR measures the change in portfolio VaR per unit change in a position's weight. But how do you practically use this when evaluating whether to add a new asset? Is marginal VaR the same as the derivative of VaR with respect to weight?

108 upvotes
AcadiFi TeamVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

Marginal VaR (MVaR) measures the rate of change of portfolio VaR with respect to a small change in a position's weight. It is precisely the partial derivative of VaR with respect to the position weight, and it provides the most efficient tool for evaluating whether a new allocation increases or decreases total risk.\n\nFormula:\n\nMVaR_i = dVaR_P / dw_i = beta_i x VaR_P\n\nwhere beta_i is the beta of asset i with respect to the portfolio (Cov(r_i, r_P) / Var(r_P)).\n\nFor a parametric (normal) VaR:\n\nMVaR_i = z_alpha x (Sigma x w)_i / sigma_P\n\nwhere Sigma is the covariance matrix, w is the weight vector, and sigma_P is portfolio volatility.\n\n`mermaid\ngraph TD\n A[\"Current Portfolio
VaR_P = $3.2M\"] --> B{\"Consider New Asset\"}\n B --> C[\"Calculate beta_new
to portfolio\"]\n C --> D[\"MVaR_new = beta_new x VaR_P\"]\n D --> E{\"Compare MVaR_new
to average MVaR\"}\n E -->|\"MVaR_new < Avg MVaR\"| F[\"Adding reduces
risk per dollar\"]\n E -->|\"MVaR_new > Avg MVaR\"| G[\"Adding increases
risk per dollar\"]\n E -->|\"MVaR_new < 0\"| H[\"Strong diversifier
reduces total VaR\"]\n`\n\nWorked Example:\n\nStonecrest Advisors manages a $120M equity portfolio with VaR(99%) = $4.8M. They consider adding Meridian Biotech with the following data:\n\n- Portfolio annual volatility: 16%\n- Meridian annual volatility: 28%\n- Correlation(Meridian, Portfolio): 0.35\n\nBeta of Meridian to portfolio:\nbeta_M = rho x sigma_M / sigma_P = 0.35 x 0.28 / 0.16 = 0.6125\n\nMVaR(Meridian) = 0.6125 x $4.8M = $2.94M per 100% weight\n\nPer $1M invested: $2.94M / $120M x $1M = $24,500\n\nAverage MVaR per $1M currently: $4.8M / $120M x $1M = $40,000\n\nSince Meridian's MVaR per dollar ($24,500) is below the portfolio average ($40,000), adding it would reduce the portfolio's VaR-to-capital ratio. The low correlation (0.35) provides diversification that makes the position risk-efficient.\n\nDecision Rule:\n- If MVaR_new < average MVaR per dollar, the new position improves risk efficiency\n- If MVaR_new > average MVaR per dollar, the new position worsens risk efficiency\n- The optimal portfolio has equal MVaR per dollar across all positions (risk parity condition)\n\nLimitations:\n- MVaR is a local measure valid only for small weight changes\n- For large allocations, incremental VaR provides a better estimate\n- Assumes constant covariance structure (breaks down in stressed markets)\n\nDive into portfolio risk analytics in our FRM course.

🛡️

Master Part I with our FRM Course

64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction

#marginal-var#portfolio-construction#risk-efficiency#beta-contribution#position-sizing