How are non-GAAP financial measures regulated, and what should analysts watch out for when companies report adjusted EBITDA or other non-GAAP metrics?

Question

AcadiFi · Accepted Answer

Non-GAAP measures are among the most important topics for CFA candidates learning financial statement analysis. They can provide genuine insight — or mask underlying problems.

**Regulatory Framework**

The SEC requires that any non-GAAP measure in public filings must:

1. **Be reconciled** to the nearest GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence
2. **Not exclude recurring charges** and label them as "non-recurring" unless they are truly unusual and infrequent
3. **Not be presented more prominently** than the corresponding GAAP measure
4. **Include a statement** explaining why management believes the measure is useful

**Common Non-GAAP Adjustments**

| Adjustment | Legitimate? | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Stock-based compensation excluded | Debatable — real economic cost | Overstates profitability |
| Restructuring charges excluded | Sometimes — if truly one-time | Serial restructurers abuse this |
| Acquisition-related costs excluded | Partially — integration costs recur | Hides cost of growth strategy |
| Litigation settlements excluded | Rare events may qualify | Frequent litigators exploit this |

**Worked Example — Ashford Digital Solutions:**

Ashford reports GAAP net income of $42 million but highlights "Adjusted EBITDA" of $118 million in its earnings release. The reconciliation reveals:

| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| GAAP net income | $42M |
| + Interest expense | $14M |
| + Tax expense | $11M |
| + Depreciation & amortization | $23M |
| + Stock-based compensation | $18M |
| + Restructuring (3rd year running) | $10M |
| **Adjusted EBITDA** | **$118M** |

An analyst should question: if restructuring costs have appeared for three consecutive years, are they truly "non-recurring"? And excluding SBC ignores $18 million in real compensation cost.

**Analyst Checklist:**

1. Always start from GAAP numbers and work toward the non-GAAP figure.
2. Track which adjustments recur year after year — serial add-backs are a red flag.
3. Compare the company's non-GAAP definition with peers — lack of standardization makes comparisons unreliable.
4. Watch for "adjusted revenue" — adjusting the top line is particularly aggressive and far less common.
5. Check if the non-GAAP measure is used for executive compensation — this creates an incentive to inflate it.

Explore earnings quality analysis in our CFA Level II FRA modules.

How are non-GAAP financial measures regulated, and what should analysts watch out for when companies report adjusted EBITDA or other non-GAAP metrics?

Master Level II with our CFA Course

Related Questions

Practice Questions