How should a company account for sales with a right of return, and what is the constraint on variable consideration?

Question

AcadiFi · Accepted Answer

Right of return is a classic variable consideration problem. The framework ensures revenue reflects only what the company expects to ultimately keep.

**Step 1: Estimate Variable Consideration**

Oakbridge can use either:
- **Expected value method** — probability-weighted average of possible outcomes
- **Most likely amount** — the single most likely outcome

For returns with a large number of similar transactions (retail), the expected value method is typically more appropriate.

Expected returns = 8% x $50M = **$4M**
Expected revenue to keep = 92% x $50M = **$46M**

**Step 2: Apply the Constraint**

Variable consideration can only be included in the transaction price to the extent it is **highly probable** (IFRS) or **probable** (US GAAP) that a **significant reversal** of revenue will NOT occur when the uncertainty resolves.

Factors increasing constraint risk:
- High susceptibility to external factors (economy, weather, fashion trends)
- Long resolution period
- Limited experience with similar transactions
- Broad range of possible outcomes

Oakbridge has extensive historical data showing stable 8% return rates → the constraint is satisfied for the $46M estimate. If Oakbridge were a startup with no history, they might need to constrain more aggressively.

**Step 3: Record the Entries**

At the time of sale ($50M shipped, cost = $30M, expected returns 8%):

| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable | $50M | |
| Revenue | | $46M |
| Refund liability | | $4M |
| Cost of goods sold | $27.6M | |
| Right of return asset | $2.4M | |
| Inventory | | $30M |

**Key accounts:**
- **Refund liability** ($4M) — expected amount to be refunded to customers
- **Right of return asset** ($2.4M) — the cost of inventory expected to be returned (8% x $30M cost)

**Revenue recognized = $46M** (not $50M)

**When Returns Actually Occur**

If actual returns are $3.5M (7% instead of 8%):
- Refund liability decreases by $3.5M (actual refunds paid)
- The remaining $0.5M refund liability is reversed into revenue
- Right of return asset is adjusted for actual inventory received back

**Balance Sheet Impact:**

| Item | Amount | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Refund liability | $4M | Current liability |
| Right of return asset | $2.4M | Current asset |
| Net liability | $1.6M | |

**Exam tip:** The refund liability and right of return asset must be presented separately — they cannot be netted. Also, the right of return asset is measured at the cost of the inventory, not the selling price.

For more variable consideration problems, check our CFA Level II question bank.

How should a company account for sales with a right of return, and what is the constraint on variable consideration?

Master Level II with our CFA Course

Related Questions

Practice Questions