What is the Sloan accrual ratio, and how does it help analysts assess earnings quality?
I've been studying CFA Level II earnings quality and the Sloan accrual ratio keeps coming up. I understand that high accruals relative to earnings suggest lower quality, but I'm not sure how to calculate the ratio or what thresholds to look for. Can someone walk through this?
The Sloan accrual ratio (named after Professor Richard Sloan's 1996 research) measures the proportion of a company's earnings that comes from accruals rather than cash. Higher accrual ratios indicate potentially lower earnings quality because accruals involve more estimation, judgment, and potential for manipulation.
The Core Insight:
Earnings = Cash component + Accrual component
Cash-based earnings tend to persist into future periods (recurring, reliable). Accrual-based earnings tend to reverse (they represent timing differences that eventually unwind). Companies with high accrual ratios often see future earnings declines.
Calculation — Two Approaches:
Balance Sheet Approach:
Accruals = (ΔNon-Cash Current Assets − ΔCurrent Liabilities excl. short-term debt − Depreciation)
Or more simply:
Accruals = Net Income − Cash Flow from Operations − Cash Flow from Investing
Then:
Sloan Accrual Ratio = Accruals / Average Total Assets
Cash Flow Statement Approach (simpler):
Accrual Ratio (CF) = (Net Income − CFO) / Average Total Assets
Worked Example — Pineridge Corp:
| Item | 2026 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $18,500,000 | |
| CFO | $9,200,000 | |
| CFI | ($7,800,000) | |
| Total assets | $142,000,000 | $128,000,000 |
Method 1: Simple accrual ratio (using CFO)
Accruals = $18,500,000 − $9,200,000 = $9,300,000
Average total assets = ($142M + $128M) / 2 = $135,000,000
Accrual ratio = $9,300,000 / $135,000,000 = 6.89%
Method 2: Aggregate accruals (using CFO + CFI)
Accruals = $18,500,000 − $9,200,000 − (−$7,800,000) = $18,500,000 − $1,400,000 = $17,100,000
Accrual ratio = $17,100,000 / $135,000,000 = 12.67%
Interpretation Guidelines:
| Accrual Ratio | Quality Signal |
|---|---|
| < 0% (negative) | Very high quality — cash earnings exceed reported |
| 0% – 5% | High quality |
| 5% – 10% | Moderate — normal accrual level |
| > 10% | Lower quality — significant accrual component |
| > 15% | Red flag — investigate further |
Pineridge's 6.89% (simple) is moderate, but the 12.67% aggregate ratio warrants investigation — it could indicate large capitalized costs or aggressive revenue recognition.
What Drives High Accrual Ratios?
- Revenue recognition — recognizing revenue before cash is collected
- Capitalization policies — capitalizing costs that should be expensed
- Working capital management — building inventory, stretching payables
- Provision reversals — releasing previously accrued liabilities
- Fair value gains — unrealized gains on financial instruments
Key Exam Points:
- Lower accrual ratio = higher earnings quality.
- The ratio measures the divergence between reported income and cash generation.
- Sloan's research showed high-accrual companies underperform low-accrual companies over subsequent periods (accrual anomaly).
- Best used in cross-sectional comparison (vs. industry peers) and time-series analysis (vs. company's own history).
Explore earnings quality metrics in our CFA Level II FRA course.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.