Why do hedge calculations often use dollar duration or DV01 instead of just modified duration?
Modified duration seems easier, so I am not seeing why managers convert it into money terms when comparing two bonds or building a hedge.
Modified duration gives relative sensitivity. Hedging needs absolute exposure.
Suppose one position is 3,000,000 par and another is 12,000,000 par. Even if the first bond has slightly higher modified duration, the second position may create more total rate risk because the holding size is much larger.
That is why desks convert sensitivity into money terms:
- modified duration tells you percent impact
- dollar duration tells you currency impact for a large yield move scale
- DV01 tells you currency impact per basis point
If Northline Bank Treasury Desk wants to neutralize a 75,000 DV01 exposure, it needs the hedge instrument's DV01, not just its modified duration, because hedge sizing happens in money terms.
Master Part I / Part II bridge with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?
When should I stop using modified duration and switch to effective duration?
How should I think about the relationship between Macaulay duration and modified duration instead of memorizing two separate definitions?
When should I prefer historical simulation VaR over delta-normal VaR?
Why can expected shortfall move a lot even when VaR barely changes?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.