A
AcadiFi
CU
CurveBookRina2026-05-20
frmPart I / Part II bridgeMarket RiskInterest Rate Risk

Why is DV01 so much smaller than dollar duration if both are supposed to measure rate risk?

I keep seeing both numbers in fixed-income notes and it feels like one of them must be redundant. If dollar duration is already the sensitivity measure, why do desks still talk in DV01?

41 upvotes
AcadiFi TeamVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

DV01 is not a different risk from dollar duration. It is the same first-order rate exposure shown on a practical basis-point scale.

Suppose Lakeshore Transit Finance 2032 has:

  • full price 98.50
  • modified duration 4.4

Dollar duration per 100 par is:

98.50 x 4.4 = 433.40

That means the bond changes by about 433.40 currency units for a full 1.00 change in yield. Because traders usually think in basis points, they divide by 10,000:

DV01 = 433.40 / 10,000 = 0.04334

So DV01 looks smaller only because the shock size is smaller.

Loading diagram...

On an exam, if the question asks for the one-basis-point P&L impact or hedge ratio, DV01 is usually the cleaner answer.

🛡️

Master Part I / Part II bridge with our FRM Course

64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction

#dv01#dollar-duration#fixed-income-risk