A
AcadiFi
RJ
RiskMgmt_Jess2026-04-05
frmPart IIMarket Risk Measurement and Management

How does the Cornish-Fisher expansion adjust VaR for non-normality, and when should you use it?

I understand that normal VaR underestimates risk when returns have fat tails. The Cornish-Fisher expansion seems like a quick fix — adjusting the z-score for skewness and kurtosis. Can someone walk through the formula and show when it works well versus when it breaks down?

109 upvotes
Verified ExpertVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

The Cornish-Fisher (CF) expansion is a pragmatic adjustment to the normal VaR that accounts for skewness and excess kurtosis without requiring a full distributional fit. It's a middle ground between naive normal VaR and computationally intensive methods like EVT.

The Formula:

z_CF = z + (z^2 - 1)/6 x S + (z^3 - 3z)/24 x K - (2z^3 - 5z)/36 x S^2

Where:

  • z = standard normal quantile (e.g., -2.326 for 99% VaR)
  • S = skewness of the return distribution
  • K = excess kurtosis of the return distribution

Then: VaR_CF = mu - z_CF x sigma

Worked Example — Havenbrook Capital equity portfolio:

Daily returns: mu = 0.03%, sigma = 1.2%, S = -0.7 (negative skew), K = 4.5 (fat tails)

Standard 99% VaR (normal):

VaR = 0.03% - (-2.326) x 1.2% = 0.03% + 2.79% = 2.82%

Cornish-Fisher adjustment:

z = -2.326

z^2 = 5.410, z^3 = -12.584

Term 1 (skewness): (5.410 - 1)/6 x (-0.7) = 4.410/6 x (-0.7) = -0.5145

Term 2 (kurtosis): (-12.584 + 6.978)/24 x 4.5 = -5.606/24 x 4.5 = -1.051

Term 3 (skew^2): -(2(-12.584) - 5(-2.326))/36 x 0.49 = -(-25.168 + 11.630)/36 x 0.49 = -(-13.538/36) x 0.49 = 0.184

z_CF = -2.326 - 0.5145 - 1.051 + 0.184 = -3.708

VaR_CF = 0.03% - (-3.708) x 1.2% = 0.03% + 4.45% = 4.48%

The CF adjustment increases VaR from 2.82% to 4.48% — a 59% increase due to fat tails and negative skewness.

When CF Works Well:

  • Moderate departures from normality (|S| < 2, K < 8)
  • Confidence levels up to 99.5%
  • As a quick analytical adjustment to parametric VaR
  • When full distributional fitting is impractical

When CF Breaks Down:

  • Extreme kurtosis (K > 10): Higher-order terms become important
  • Very high confidence levels (99.9%+): The expansion diverges
  • Bimodal distributions: CF assumes unimodal
  • Can produce non-monotonic quantile functions (VaR increases then decreases with confidence)

FRM Exam Tips:

  • Know the formula and be able to compute z_CF with given S and K
  • Negative skewness makes z_CF more negative (larger VaR)
  • Positive excess kurtosis also makes z_CF more negative (fatter tails)
  • CF is a quick shortcut — for serious tail risk, use EVT

Practice Cornish-Fisher calculations in our FRM Part II question bank.

🛡️

Master Part II with our FRM Course

64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction

#cornish-fisher#var-adjustment#skewness#kurtosis#parametric-var