How is the Default Risk Charge calculated under FRTB, and how does it differ from the old incremental risk charge?
I'm reviewing the FRTB DRC for FRM Part II. The Default Risk Charge replaces the IRC from Basel 2.5. I know it captures jump-to-default risk, but I'm unclear on the simulation methodology, the 1-year horizon, and how correlations between issuers are modeled. How does the calculation actually work?
The Default Risk Charge (DRC) under FRTB captures the jump-to-default (JTD) risk of traded credit instruments — the sudden loss when an issuer defaults. It replaces the Incremental Risk Charge (IRC) from Basel 2.5 with a more comprehensive framework.\n\nKey Differences from IRC:\n\n| Feature | IRC (Basel 2.5) | DRC (FRTB) |\n|---|---|---|\n| Scope | Bonds, CDS | All instruments with default risk |\n| Horizon | 1 year, constant level of risk | 1 year, constant positions |\n| Confidence level | 99.9% | 99.9% |\n| Migration risk | Included | Excluded (captured in ES) |\n| Equity default | Not covered | Covered via equity JTD |\n| Hedging recognition | Full | Constrained by maturity mismatch |\n\nDRC Simulation Steps:\n\n1. Compute JTD amounts for each position:\n - Long bond: JTD = Notional x LGD (loss given default)\n - Short CDS protection: JTD = -Notional x LGD (hedge)\n - Equity: JTD = Market Value (total loss in default)\n\n2. Assign default probabilities based on credit rating:\n\n| Rating | 1-Year PD |\n|---|---|\n| AAA | 0.03% |\n| AA | 0.06% |\n| A | 0.10% |\n| BBB | 0.30% |\n| BB | 1.20% |\n| B | 3.50% |\n| CCC | 10.0% |\n\n3. Simulate correlated defaults using a multi-factor Gaussian copula with:\n - Systematic risk factor loadings based on industry and region\n - Idiosyncratic risk component per issuer\n - Default occurs when the latent variable falls below the PD threshold\n\n4. Calculate portfolio loss for each simulation trial\n5. Determine 99.9% quantile of the loss distribution over 10,000+ simulations\n\nWorked Example:\nHedgeworth Securities holds:\n- Long $20M Hartland Corp bond (BBB, LGD 60%): JTD = $20M x 0.60 = $12M\n- Short $15M Hartland CDS protection: JTD = -$15M x 0.60 = -$9M\n- Long $8M Eastwick Inc bond (BB, LGD 65%): JTD = $8M x 0.65 = $5.2M\n\nNet JTD on Hartland: $12M - $9M = $3M (partially hedged)\nNet JTD on Eastwick: $5.2M (unhedged)\n\nAfter simulation (10,000 trials, asset correlation 0.25):\n- Mean loss: $0.18M\n- 99.9% loss: $8.9M (both issuers default in stress scenario)\n\nDRC = $8.9M\n\nHedging Recognition Constraints:\n- Long/short positions on the same obligor may offset\n- Maturity mismatches between bond and CDS reduce hedge effectiveness\n- Index hedges provide only partial offset against single-name positions\n- Systematic hedges (shorting an index) are recognized at a reduced correlation-based benefit\n\nDeepen your understanding of credit risk capital in our FRM Part II course.
Master Part II with our FRM Course
64 lessons · 120+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
How is the swap rate curve constructed, and why does bootstrapping from deposit rates to swap rates matter for valuation?
Why did the industry shift to OIS discounting for collateralized derivatives, and how does it differ from LIBOR discounting?
How does a knock-in barrier option actually activate, and what determines its value before the barrier is breached?
How does linear interpolation work on a bootstrapped yield curve, and what artifacts does it introduce?
How does the cheapest-to-deliver switch option work in Treasury bond futures, and when does the CTD bond change?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.