Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
I just got an LM5 question wrong. The right answer was "provision for early retirement" reduces risk tolerance because it shortens duration. I picked "high employee turnover" because turnover obviously reduces the PBO. Both reduce liabilities, so why are they treated differently?
Short answer: they reduce DIFFERENT THINGS. Early retirement reduces the DURATION of liabilities (cash flows shift earlier in time), which directly drives the risk-tolerance question. Higher turnover reduces the SIZE of the PBO (some employees never vest), but does not necessarily change WHEN the remaining benefits get paid. The LM5 risk-tolerance question is specifically about duration, not dollar size.
The two distinct effects
Why duration matters for risk tolerance
Risk tolerance scales with the time available to ride out volatility:
- Long duration (15-20 years until peak liability payments) → can absorb a bad year, equity-heavy allocation OK
- Short duration (5-7 years until peak payments) → less room to absorb drawdowns, needs more fixed income
Pulling cash flows EARLIER means you need more LIQUIDITY SOONER → less ability to hold volatile assets → lower risk tolerance.
Why turnover affects PBO size, not duration
Suppose a plan has 1,000 employees. The PBO depends on:
- How many employees will eventually vest and receive benefits
- The expected dollar amount per vested employee
- The timing of those payments
High turnover reduces #1 (fewer employees stick around to vest) → smaller PBO. But it does NOT systematically shift WHEN the remaining vested employees receive their benefits. The remaining vested employees still retire at age 65 with their accrued entitlements.
There is a SECOND-ORDER effect: high turnover could mean the average tenure of remaining employees is shorter (the long-tenured employees aren't leaving), which slightly LENGTHENS duration. But that is small and not the focus of the LM5 question.
The exam-day decision rule
Memory hook
DURATION moves SHORTER when CASH FLOWS move EARLIER.
- Early retirement = earlier cash flows = shorter duration
- Lump-sum option = single early cash flow = much shorter duration
- COLA = larger LATER cash flows = longer duration
- Turnover = fewer cash flows of the SAME timing = smaller PBO, same duration
For the full risk-objective framework see our DB pension risk article.
Master Level III with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
How exactly does the asset allocation change as I move from accumulation to consolidation to spending?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.