I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
I am the founder of a B2B SaaS company. My personal income swings 50\% year to year and definitely correlates with tech-stock cycles — when the market is down, my customers cancel and my income drops. My financial advisor says I should still hold a diversified $60/40$ portfolio because that is what advisors recommend. Is he wrong?
Short answer: likely yes, your advisor is applying the wrong framework. Because your human capital is EQUITY-LIKE (volatile + correlated with tech equity markets), you are already heavily exposed to equity risk through your business income. To balance your TOTAL wealth, your financial portfolio should hold MORE bonds, not the standard 60/40 stocks/bonds mix. Some entrepreneurs in your position should hold near-100% bonds in financial accounts.
The classification matters more than the dollar amount
When advisors recommend 60/40, they implicitly assume your income is bond-like (stable, uncorrelated). For you, that assumption is exactly backwards:
If your target total-wealth equity allocation is , you are already SIGNIFICANTLY past it from human capital alone. Adding more equity in your financial portfolio pushes you further out of balance.
The math your advisor is missing
Reading the symbols: = human capital, = financial capital, ; = how equity-like your income is (0.80 = highly market-correlated); = target overall equity weight; = required equity in FC.
Let total wealth .
With (equity-like HC), required equity in FC to hit overall:
A negative equity weight means short equities. Practically, you cannot short, so the answer is equities in FC. Your business already overshoots the equity target.
The practical prescription
For an entrepreneur with equity-like human capital:
- Heavy bond tilt in financial accounts — Treasuries, high-quality investment-grade credit, possibly TIPS for inflation protection
- Larger emergency fund — 12-24 months of expenses (vs the standard 6) because revenue volatility creates more frequent liquidity needs
- Avoid your own industry sector — do NOT own tech ETFs if you are a tech founder. Add concentration risk.
- Personal disability / business interruption insurance — converts some equity-like HC into a more bond-like stream
- Diversify your customer base — long-tail of small customers is more bond-like than 3 big enterprise contracts
When to add equity back
When you EXIT the business (acquisition, IPO, retirement), your HC instantly drops to near zero and you switch to bond-like income (proceeds invested in bonds). At THAT point, your financial portfolio should aggressively rotate INTO equities — the textbook 80/20 stocks/bonds tilt for a wealthy retiree.
For the full life-cycle framework see our human capital article.
Master Level III with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
How exactly does the asset allocation change as I move from accumulation to consolidation to spending?
Related Articles
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.