When and why are stock options excluded from diluted EPS as anti-dilutive, and how do you test for anti-dilution?
I'm working through CFA EPS problems and keep getting confused about when options are anti-dilutive. I know out-of-the-money options shouldn't dilute EPS, but what about situations where the company reports a loss? Can in-the-money options still be anti-dilutive? What's the mechanical test?
Anti-dilutive securities are excluded from diluted EPS because including them would increase EPS or reduce the loss per share, which would be misleading. The anti-dilution test depends on both the security type and whether the company reports net income or a net loss.
Fundamental Rule:
A potentially dilutive security is anti-dilutive if its inclusion would increase EPS (or reduce loss per share). Such securities must be excluded from the diluted EPS calculation.
Stock Options — The Exercise Price Test:
Options are anti-dilutive when the exercise price exceeds the average market price (out-of-the-money). Under the treasury stock method, out-of-the-money options would result in the company buying back MORE shares than it issues, which would reduce the denominator and increase EPS.
Worked Example:
Pinnacle Dynamics has the following:
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Net income | $12.4M |
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.