How does a call back spread work, and why is it considered a volatility play rather than a directional bet?
I see call back spreads described as the inverse of ratio spreads in my CFA Derivatives material. You sell fewer calls at a lower strike and buy more at a higher strike. This seems counterintuitive — why would you want to be net long more expensive OTM calls? When does this strategy actually make money?
A call back spread (also called a reverse ratio spread) sells a smaller number of lower-strike calls and buys a larger number of higher-strike calls, typically in a 1:2 ratio. Unlike the ratio spread, it has unlimited upside potential and profits from large moves — making it a volatility play.
Construction (1:2 Ratio):
- Sell 1 call at strike K1 (lower, ITM or ATM)
- Buy 2 calls at strike K2 (higher, OTM)
This often generates a net credit because the single ITM/ATM call sold is more expensive than each OTM call purchased.
Worked Example:
Zenith Robotics trades at 70 | +80 | -5.40 - (2 x 5.40 - 1.20 net credit**
Loading diagram...
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.