How does a call back spread work, and why is it considered a volatility play rather than a directional bet?
I see call back spreads described as the inverse of ratio spreads in my CFA Derivatives material. You sell fewer calls at a lower strike and buy more at a higher strike. This seems counterintuitive — why would you want to be net long more expensive OTM calls? When does this strategy actually make money?
A call back spread (also called a reverse ratio spread) sells a smaller number of lower-strike calls and buys a larger number of higher-strike calls, typically in a 1:2 ratio. Unlike the ratio spread, it has unlimited upside potential and profits from large moves — making it a volatility play.\n\nConstruction (1:2 Ratio):\n\n- Sell 1 call at strike K1 (lower, ITM or ATM)\n- Buy 2 calls at strike K2 (higher, OTM)\n\nThis often generates a net credit because the single ITM/ATM call sold is more expensive than each OTM call purchased.\n\nWorked Example:\n\nZenith Robotics trades at $72. Trader Malik anticipates a large move (earnings in 2 weeks) and builds a 1:2 call back spread:\n\n| Leg | Strike | Premium | Quantity |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Sell call | $70 | +$5.40 | 1 |\n| Buy call | $80 | -$2.10 | 2 |\n\nNet premium: $5.40 - (2 x $2.10) = $5.40 - $4.20 = +$1.20 net credit\n\n`mermaid\ngraph LR\n A[\"Below $70
All expire worthless
Keep $1.20 credit\"] --> B[\"$70 to $80
Short call has value
Longs worthless
LOSS ZONE\"]\n B --> C[\"At $80
Max loss point
Short = $10, Longs = $0
Loss = $8.80\"]\n C --> D[\"$80 to $91.20
Longs gaining
Reducing loss\"]\n D --> E[\"Above $91.20
Upper breakeven
PROFIT ZONE
Unlimited upside\"]\n`\n\nPayoff Analysis:\n\n| Stock Price | Short $70 Call (x1) | Long $80 Calls (x2) | Net (incl credit) |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| $65 | $0 | $0 | +$1.20 |\n| $75 | -$5.00 | $0 | -$3.80 |\n| $80 | -$10.00 | $0 | -$8.80 |\n| $85 | -$15.00 | +$10.00 | -$3.80 |\n| $91.20 | -$21.20 | +$22.40 | $0.00 |\n| $100 | -$30.00 | +$40.00 | +$11.20 |\n\nMaximum Loss:\nOccurs at K2 ($80): Short call value ($10) - Net credit ($1.20) = $8.80\n\nBreakeven Points:\nLower: Below K1 — the position profits from the credit ($1.20) if both options expire worthless\nUpper: K2 + (Max loss / net long calls) = $80 + $8.80/1 = $88.80\n\nWait — let me recalculate. Above $80, the net position is long 1 call (2 long minus 1 short). Upper breakeven = K2 + Max loss = $80 + $8.80 = $88.80.\n\nWhy It's a Volatility Play:\nThe strategy profits from large moves in either direction (down = keep credit; way up = unlimited gains). It only loses when the stock moves modestly upward into the \"dead zone\" between the strikes. This makes it ideal before events where the magnitude of the move is uncertain but a large move is expected.\n\nComparison to Long Straddle:\nBoth profit from large moves, but the back spread has a directional bias (profits more from upside) and often enters at a net credit, reducing downside risk.\n\nExplore volatility strategies in our CFA Derivatives course.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What are the most reliable candlestick reversal patterns, and how should CFA candidates interpret them in context?
What are the CFA Standards requirements for research reports, and what must be disclosed versus recommended?
How does IAS 41 require biological assets to be measured, and what happens when fair value cannot be reliably determined?
Under IFRIC 12, how should a company account for a service concession arrangement, and what determines whether the intangible or financial asset model applies?
What is the investment entities exception under IFRS 10, and why are some parents exempt from consolidating their subsidiaries?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.