What's the difference between a bond's maturity and its duration? Why does duration matter more for risk?
I'm studying fixed income for CFA Level I and I understand that maturity is simply when the bond's principal is repaid. But duration seems much more complicated. My textbook says duration measures 'interest rate sensitivity' but then also talks about Macaulay duration as a 'weighted average time to receive cash flows.' Are these the same thing? And why do portfolio managers care more about duration than maturity?
Unlock with Scholar — $19/month
Get full access to all Q&A answers, practice question explanations, and progress tracking.
No credit card required for free trial
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.