What happens to borrowing cost capitalization when construction of a qualifying asset is suspended for an extended period?
I know IAS 23 requires capitalizing borrowing costs during the active construction of a qualifying asset. But a practice question described a scenario where construction stopped for 8 months due to a permitting dispute. Are borrowing costs still capitalized during the suspension? The answer surprised me.
Under IAS 23, borrowing costs must be expensed during extended periods when active development of the qualifying asset is suspended. This is a commonly tested exception to the capitalization rule.
The Rule:
Capitalization of borrowing costs shall be suspended during extended periods in which active development is interrupted. However, capitalization is NOT suspended during a period in which substantial technical and administrative work is being carried out, or when a temporary delay is a necessary part of the process.
Example:
Magellan Construction is building a waterfront mixed-use complex. Total project-specific borrowing = $40,000,000 at 6% annually. Timeline:
| Period | Activity | Monthly Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Jan–Jun 2025 | Active construction | $200,000 |
| Jul 2025–Feb 2026 | Halted — zoning litigation (8 months) | $200,000 |
| Mar–Dec 2026 | Construction resumes | $200,000 |
Monthly borrowing cost = 200,000**
Accounting treatment:
- Jan–Jun 2025: Capitalize 1,200,000** added to asset cost
- Jul 2025–Feb 2026: Expense 1,600,000** in profit or loss
- Mar–Dec 2026: Capitalize 2,000,000** added to asset cost
Loading diagram...
When suspension does NOT stop capitalization:
- Technical and administrative work — if architects are redesigning during the pause, or engineers are testing foundations, capitalization continues because development work is ongoing.
- Seasonal delays — a road project in northern Canada that cannot proceed during winter months may continue capitalizing because the delay is an inherent, expected part of the construction process.
- Brief delays — a two-week work stoppage for routine equipment maintenance would not typically be considered "extended."
Analyst perspective:
The distinction matters significantly. During the 8-month suspension, Magellan's income statement absorbs $1.6M in interest expense that would otherwise have been capitalized. This reduces reported earnings and could affect debt covenants tied to interest coverage ratios.
Comparison with US GAAP:
ASC 835-20 contains a similar requirement — interest capitalization ceases when activities necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are deliberately suspended. Both frameworks converge on this point.
Exam tip: Look for keywords like "halted," "suspended," "delayed due to litigation/strike/funding shortfall" as signals that capitalization must stop. Keywords like "engineering studies in progress" or "seasonal suspension" signal that capitalization continues.
Explore more IAS 23 scenarios in our CFA Level I FRA question bank.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.