How do real options change capital budgeting decisions? I keep getting the wrong answer on NPV-with-options problems.
I'm studying CFA Level II Corporate Issuers and the real options section is tricky. The curriculum says projects can have embedded options like timing, expansion, and abandonment — but how do you actually incorporate them into NPV analysis? A worked example would help.
Real options recognize that managers have flexibility — they're not locked into a static 'invest or don't invest' decision. This flexibility has value, and ignoring it means standard NPV analysis systematically undervalues projects.
The Core Formula:
Expanded NPV = Static NPV + Value of Real Option(s)
A project with a negative static NPV might actually be worth pursuing if the embedded real options are valuable enough.
Types of Real Options:
Worked Example — Abandonment Option:
Silverbrook Mining evaluates a copper extraction project:
- Initial investment: $12 million
- Expected cash flows: $2.8 million/year for 6 years
- Required return: 11%
- Static NPV = $2.8M x PVIFA(11%, 6) - $12M = $2.8M x 4.2305 - $12M = $11.845M - $12M = -$155,000
Static NPV is negative — reject the project under traditional analysis.
But Silverbrook can sell the mining equipment and land rights for $7 million after year 2 if copper prices collapse. Using a binomial model, suppose there's a 40% probability that copper falls, making the project worth only $1.5 million in year 2 (continuing). Abandonment value in year 2 is $7 million.
- Value of abandonment option in bad state = $7.0M - $1.5M = $5.5M (exercise is optimal)
- PV of option value = 0.40 x $5.5M / (1.11)^2 = $2.2M / 1.2321 = $1.785M
Expanded NPV = -$155,000 + $1,785,000 = +$1,630,000
The project should be accepted once the abandonment option is included.
Common Exam Pitfalls:
- Don't add option value to projects that already have positive NPV in the question — the option value is already embedded in the static analysis if the question says so.
- Timing options are most valuable when uncertainty is high and the project is close to breakeven. If static NPV is deeply positive, waiting has opportunity cost.
- Expansion options are most valuable for platform investments — initial entry into a new market even at a small loss can be justified if it creates future growth opportunities.
Practice real options problems in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.