What does the Carhart 4-factor model add beyond Fama-French, and how does momentum factor work?
My CFA Level II materials mention the Carhart model which adds a momentum factor to Fama-French. What exactly is momentum in this context? How is WML constructed, and what does it tell us about a fund manager's true skill?
The Carhart (1997) 4-factor model extends Fama-French by adding a momentum factor (WML — Winners Minus Losers). It was originally developed to evaluate mutual fund performance.
The Model:
E(Ri) - Rf = bi_mkt x (Rm - Rf) + bi_smb x SMB + bi_hml x HML + bi_wml x WML
What Is the Momentum Factor?
Momentum is the empirical observation that stocks that performed well over the past 3-12 months tend to continue performing well, and losers tend to continue losing. This is one of the most robust anomalies in finance.
WML Construction:
- Winners: Top decile (or quartile) of stocks ranked by past 12-month return (skipping the most recent month to avoid microstructure effects)
- Losers: Bottom decile (or quartile)
- WML = Return of Winners portfolio minus Return of Losers portfolio
Historically, WML has averaged about 6-8% per year in US equity markets.
Why Add Momentum?
Carhart showed that many mutual funds with apparent alpha under the 3-factor model were actually just riding momentum. Once you control for WML, much of the 'skill' disappears.
Worked Example:
Harbor Point evaluates two fund managers:
Manager A — Eastgate Growth Fund:
| Factor | Loading | Premium | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | 1.05 | 6.0% | 6.30% |
| SMB | -0.20 | 2.5% | -0.50% |
| HML | -0.40 | 3.0% | -1.20% |
| WML | 0.55 | 7.0% | 3.85% |
| Expected excess return | 8.45% |
Actual excess return: 9.20%. Alpha = 9.20% - 8.45% = +0.75%
Manager B — Westfield Value Fund:
| Factor | Loading | Premium | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | 0.90 | 6.0% | 5.40% |
| SMB | 0.30 | 2.5% | 0.75% |
| HML | 0.65 | 3.0% | 1.95% |
| WML | -0.10 | 7.0% | -0.70% |
| Expected excess return | 7.40% |
Actual excess return: 8.60%. Alpha = 8.60% - 7.40% = +1.20%
Manager B shows higher true alpha despite lower raw returns because Manager A's performance was largely explained by momentum exposure (WML loading of 0.55).
Exam tip: CFA Level II often presents a fund's 3-factor alpha and asks whether adding momentum changes the conclusion about manager skill. A fund with high momentum loading and positive 3-factor alpha may have zero or negative 4-factor alpha — meaning the manager was just buying recent winners rather than demonstrating stock-picking ability.
Learn more about performance attribution models in our CFA Level II course on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.