Why do we need a convexity adjustment and how does it improve the duration-based price estimate?
I understand that modified duration gives a linear approximation of bond price changes, but the CFA Level I material says this approximation has errors for large yield changes. How does convexity fix this, and can someone show the math with a real example?
Duration gives a straight-line estimate of price changes, but bond prices actually move along a curve. Convexity captures that curvature and corrects duration's error.
Why Duration Alone Isn't Enough:
Modified duration assumes a linear relationship: %ΔP ≈ -ModDur x Δy
But the actual price-yield relationship is a convex curve. Duration overestimates price declines when yields rise and underestimates price gains when yields fall. The error grows as the yield change increases.
Loading diagram...
The Full Price Change Formula:
%ΔP ≈ (-ModDur x Δy) + (0.5 x Convexity x (Δy)^2)
The convexity term is always positive (for option-free bonds), meaning it always adds to the price estimate — which is correct because the actual curve lies above the duration tangent line.
Worked Example: Pelham Financial holds a bond with:
- Modified duration: 7.25
- Convexity: 62.8
- Current price: $1,034.50
Scenario: Yields rise by 150 bps (+0.015)
Duration-only estimate: %ΔP ≈ -7.25 x 0.015 = -10.875% Estimated price: 921.99
With convexity adjustment: %ΔP ≈ -7.25 x 0.015 + 0.5 x 62.8 x (0.015)^2 %ΔP ≈ -0.10875 + 0.5 x 62.8 x 0.000225 %ΔP ≈ -0.10875 + 0.00707 = -10.168% Estimated price: 929.30
The convexity adjustment recovers $7.31 of the overestimated loss.
Scenario: Yields fall by 150 bps (-0.015)
Duration-only: %ΔP ≈ +10.875% → 1,154.33
Convexity adds $7.31 to the gain estimate as well, correctly capturing the asymmetry.
Key Insights:
- Convexity is always positive for option-free bonds
- Higher convexity is desirable — it means bigger gains when yields fall and smaller losses when yields rise
- Convexity matters most for large yield changes; for small changes (10-20 bps), duration alone is adequate
For more on managing interest rate risk, check our CFA Level I Fixed Income course.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.