How do you build an amortization schedule for the excess purchase price under the equity method?
I just got destroyed by a practice vignette on equity method amortization. Pelham Capital acquired 40% of Stonebridge Mfg for 500 million at acquisition. The excess was allocated: 30M to customer relationships (6-year life), and the rest to goodwill. I need help building the amortization schedule and understanding how it flows through the investment account balance over multiple years.
Let me build this out systematically so you can replicate it on exam day.
Step 1: Compute the Excess
Pelham paid $260M for 40% of Stonebridge.
Share of book equity = 40% x 200M
Total excess = 200M = $60M
Step 2: Allocate the Excess
| Component | Pelham's Share | Useful Life | Annual Amort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patents | $40M | 8 years | $5.0M |
| Customer relationships | $30M | 6 years | $5.0M |
| Goodwill | 40M - 10M** | — | — |
Wait — that gives negative goodwill. Let me re-read the problem. The excess of 40M/0.40 = 30M/0.40 = $75M for customer relationships. But we only care about Pelham's 40% share:
- Patents: 5.0M/year**
- Customer relationships: 5.0M/year**
- Goodwill: 40M - 10M**
Actually, let me restate the problem correctly. If the allocations already represent Pelham's share:
Goodwill = 40M - 10M**
A negative goodwill (bargain purchase) would be recognized as a gain. But more likely the question means total excess is 60M - 30M = -10M is recognized immediately.
Corrected Amortization Schedule:
| Year | Patent Amort | Customer Rel Amort | Total Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $5.0M | $5.0M | $10.0M |
| 2 | $5.0M | $5.0M | $10.0M |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 6 | $5.0M | $5.0M | $10.0M |
| 7 | $5.0M | $0 | $5.0M |
| 8 | $5.0M | $0 | $5.0M |
Step 3: Investment Account Balance (Year 1)
Assume Stonebridge earns 10M dividends:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Opening investment | $260.0M |
| + Equity income (40% x $50M) | +$20.0M |
| - Amortization | -$10.0M |
| - Dividends received (40% x $10M) | -$4.0M |
| + Bargain purchase gain | +$10.0M |
| Ending balance | $276.0M |
Key point: Dividends reduce the investment account (they are a return OF capital, not income). Amortization also reduces the account. Only the share of investee net income and the one-time bargain gain increase it.
For more equity method vignettes, explore our CFA Level II practice questions.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.