What exactly is 'smart beta' or factor investing, and how does it differ from traditional passive indexing?
I keep hearing about 'smart beta' and 'factor investing' in the CFA Level I material. I understand traditional market-cap-weighted indexing, but I'm confused about how factor-based strategies work. Are they active or passive? What factors are commonly used?
Factor investing (often marketed as 'smart beta') sits at the intersection of active and passive management. It uses systematic, rules-based approaches to capture specific return drivers — without the discretionary stock-picking of traditional active management.
Traditional Indexing vs. Factor Investing:
| Feature | Cap-Weighted Index | Factor/Smart Beta |
|---|---|---|
| Weighting | Market capitalization | Factor exposure (value, momentum, etc.) |
| Rebalancing rule | Float-adjusted cap | Systematic factor screens |
| Active decisions | None | Factor selection, rebalancing frequency |
| Fees | Very low (3-10 bps) | Low-to-moderate (15-50 bps) |
| Concentration risk | Tilted to mega-caps | Depends on factor |
The Major Factors (Fama-French + Extensions):
- Value — Buy stocks with low P/B, P/E, or high dividend yield. Based on the observation that 'cheap' stocks tend to outperform over long horizons.
- Size (Small-Cap) — Smaller companies have historically delivered higher returns than large-caps, possibly as compensation for liquidity and information risk.
- Momentum — Stocks that have performed well over the past 6-12 months tend to continue outperforming in the near term.
- Quality — Companies with high profitability, low leverage, and stable earnings tend to outperform, especially in downturns.
- Low Volatility — Contrary to CAPM predictions, low-volatility stocks have delivered similar or higher risk-adjusted returns than high-volatility stocks.
Example: Cedric Asset Management launches a 'multi-factor' ETF that screens the Russell 1000 for stocks in the top 30% by momentum, top 30% by quality, and bottom 30% by valuation. It equal-weights the ~120 stocks that pass all three screens and rebalances quarterly. This is systematic (passive-like) but non-cap-weighted (active-like).
Is It Active or Passive? The CFA curriculum treats factor investing as a middle ground. It's rules-based like passive but makes active bets on which factors will deliver premiums. The key risk is that any factor can underperform for extended periods — value, for instance, lagged growth for most of the 2010s.
Explore more equity strategies in our CFA Level I practice questions.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.