How do you value the rights in a rights offering, and what determines whether shareholders should exercise or sell?
I'm working through CFA equity valuation and encountered a problem where a company announces a rights offering at a subscription price below market value. I'm confused about how to calculate the theoretical value of a right and when it makes economic sense for a shareholder to exercise versus selling the right in the secondary market.
A rights offering gives existing shareholders the option to purchase new shares at a discounted subscription price, preserving their proportional ownership. The theoretical value of a right depends on whether shares trade cum-rights or ex-rights.
Cum-Rights Value:
Value of one right = (Market price cum-rights - Subscription price) / (N + 1)
where N = number of existing rights needed to buy one new share.
Ex-Rights Value:
Value of one right = (Market price ex-rights - Subscription price) / N
Worked Example: Fenwick Industries trades at 36 per share (5 rights needed for 1 new share).
- Cum-rights value = (36) / (5 + 1) = 2.00 per right**
- Theoretical ex-rights price = 2.00 = $46.00
- Ex-rights value check = (36) / 5 = 2.00**
Exercise vs. Sell Decision:
A shareholder should be economically indifferent between exercising and selling if the right trades at its theoretical value. However:
- Exercise if you want to maintain your ownership percentage and believe the stock is undervalued
- Sell if you need liquidity or believe the diluted share price will decline below the theoretical ex-rights price
- Do nothing is the worst outcome — you lose value equal to the right's worth without any compensation
Key Insight: The rights offering itself does not create or destroy value for existing shareholders in theory — it merely transfers value from old shares to the right. The subscription price discount is offset by dilution. What matters is how the company deploys the capital raised.
For more practice on equity corporate actions, explore our CFA question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.