How does duration matching immunize a portfolio against a single liability?
I'm studying liability-driven investing for CFA Level I. The concept of immunization says I should match the portfolio's duration to the liability's duration. But how does this actually protect me? If rates change, both my assets and liabilities change — why does matching durations work?
Immunization is a strategy that ensures a bond portfolio will have sufficient value to meet a future liability regardless of interest rate changes. For a single liability, the key condition is that the portfolio's Macaulay duration equals the liability's time horizon.
Why Duration Matching Works:
When rates change, two opposing effects occur:
- Price effect: If rates rise, bond prices fall (bad if you need to sell)
- Reinvestment effect: If rates rise, coupon reinvestment earns more (good for future value)
At the duration point, these two effects exactly offset each other. Duration is the 'balancing point' where price risk and reinvestment risk cancel out.
Loading diagram...
Example — Bellingham Insurance (fictional):
Liability: Pay $5 million in exactly 7 years. Current rate: 5%.
PV of liability: 3,553,408**
Immunization portfolio: Purchase bonds with Macaulay duration = 7 years, invest $3,553,408 today.
Scenario 1: Rates immediately jump to 7%
- Bond prices fall (portfolio value drops immediately)
- But coupons are reinvested at 7% (higher income accumulates)
- At year 7: portfolio value ≈ $5,000,000 (the effects offset)
Scenario 2: Rates immediately drop to 3%
- Bond prices rise (portfolio value increases immediately)
- But coupons are reinvested at 3% (lower income accumulates)
- At year 7: portfolio value ≈ $5,000,000 (again, the effects offset)
Conditions for Successful Immunization:
- Portfolio Macaulay duration = Liability horizon
- PV of assets >= PV of liability
- Portfolio convexity >= Liability convexity (minimally, but not excessively)
- Yield curve shift must be parallel (a key limitation)
- Must rebalance as time passes and rates change
Exam Tip: The CFA exam tests the immunization conditions and the trade-off between price risk and reinvestment risk. Remember to use Macaulay duration (not modified) for the matching condition.
Practice immunization problems in our CFA Level I question bank.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.