How do interest rate caps, floors, and collars work for hedging floating-rate debt?
I'm studying interest rate options for CFA Level II and keep getting confused between caps, floors, and collars. If a company has floating-rate debt, which one should they use? Can someone walk through a practical example with actual numbers showing payoffs at different rate scenarios?
Interest rate caps, floors, and collars are essential hedging tools for managing floating-rate exposure. Let's clarify each one with a concrete scenario.
Setup: Granite Construction has a $100 million floating-rate loan at SOFR + 150bps, resetting quarterly. Current SOFR is 4.25%. The CFO wants to limit interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Cap: A cap is a series of call options (caplets) on an interest rate. It pays off when the reference rate exceeds the cap rate.
- Granite buys a 3-year cap at 5.50% on SOFR
- Premium: 1.20% of notional ($1.2 million upfront)
- If SOFR rises to 6.00%, the caplet pays: (6.00% - 5.50%) x 125,000** per quarter
- Granite's effective rate is capped at 5.50% + 1.50% spread = 7.00%
Interest Rate Floor: A floor is a series of put options (floorlets) on an interest rate. It pays off when the reference rate falls below the floor rate. Floors are typically bought by floating-rate lenders/investors who want to protect their income.
Interest Rate Collar: A collar combines a long cap with a short floor (for a borrower). The premium received from selling the floor partially or fully offsets the cap premium.
- Granite buys the 5.50% cap (costs 1.20%)
- Granite sells a 3.50% floor (receives 0.80%)
- Net premium: 0.40% ($400,000)
- Effective SOFR range: 3.50% to 5.50%
Loading diagram...
Payoff Summary at Different SOFR Levels:
| SOFR | Cap Payoff | Floor Payoff | Net Position | Effective Rate (+ 150bps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.00% | $0 | -$125,000 (pay out) | Floor limits downside benefit | 5.00% |
| 3.50% | $0 | $0 | No payoffs | 5.00% |
| 4.50% | $0 | $0 | No payoffs | 6.00% |
| 5.50% | $0 | $0 | At cap strike | 7.00% |
| 6.50% | +$250,000 | $0 | Cap limits upside cost | 7.00% |
Zero-Cost Collar: If the floor premium exactly equals the cap premium, it's called a zero-cost collar. This is popular because there's no upfront cash outlay, but the borrower gives up the benefit of rates falling below the floor.
Exam tip: The CFA exam frequently asks which instrument a floating-rate borrower should use. Remember: borrowers buy caps (or collars) to protect against rising rates. Lenders buy floors to protect against falling rates. A collar gives up some downside benefit in exchange for a cheaper cap.
Practice more interest rate derivatives in our CFA Level II question bank on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.