How does purchasing power parity affect international equity valuation, and should I adjust DCF models for PPP?
I'm studying CFA Level II international valuation and confused about when and how to incorporate PPP into equity valuation. If I'm valuing a European company in euros but need to present in dollars, should I use spot rates, PPP-implied rates, or something else?
International valuation with currency considerations is a classic Level II topic that integrates equity valuation with economics. The key is understanding when PPP is relevant and which approach to use.
Two Approaches to International DCF:
Approach 1: Foreign Currency DCF (then convert)
- Project cash flows in the local currency (euros)
- Discount at the local currency cost of capital
- Convert the resulting intrinsic value to domestic currency (USD) at the spot rate
Approach 2: Domestic Currency DCF
- Convert each year's foreign currency cash flows to domestic currency using forward rates or PPP-implied rates
- Discount at the domestic currency cost of capital
Where PPP Comes In: PPP predicts that the exchange rate adjusts to equalize purchasing power across countries. The relative PPP formula gives us expected future exchange rates:
E(S_{t}) = S_0 x [(1 + inflation_domestic) / (1 + inflation_foreign)]^t
This is theoretically equivalent to using forward rates (via covered interest rate parity) in a well-functioning market.
Worked Example: You're valuing Stellaris Aerospace (headquartered in Frankfurt) from a USD perspective.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Year 1 FCFF (EUR) | EUR 180M |
| Year 2 FCFF (EUR) | EUR 210M |
| Terminal value (EUR) | EUR 3,500M |
| EUR WACC | 8.5% |
| USD WACC | 9.2% |
| Spot rate | $1.12/EUR |
| US inflation | 2.8% |
| Eurozone inflation | 2.0% |
Using PPP to forecast exchange rates: Year 1: 1.129/EUR Year 2: 1.138/EUR
Approach 1 (EUR DCF then convert): EV_EUR = 180/1.085 + 210/1.085^2 + 3500/1.085^2 = EUR 3,316M EV_USD = EUR 3,316M x 3,714M**
Approach 2 (Convert then USD DCF): Year 1 FCFF_USD = EUR 180M x 203M Year 2 FCFF_USD = EUR 210M x 239M Terminal_USD = EUR 3,500M x 3,983M EV_USD = 203/1.092 + 239/1.092^2 + 3983/1.092^2 = $3,720M
The two approaches give approximately the same answer (small differences due to rounding), which is a consistency check.
Practical Considerations:
- PPP holds better over long horizons (5+ years) than short-term
- For 1-2 year forecasts, forward rates may be more appropriate
- Emerging market currencies often deviate significantly from PPP due to capital controls, trade barriers
Exam Tip: Both approaches should give the same value if applied consistently. The exam often tests whether you can correctly apply PPP-implied rates and identify which discount rate matches which currency's cash flows.
Explore international equity valuation in our CFA Level II course.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.