How do you calculate the justified P/E ratio from the Gordon Growth Model, and when would you use trailing vs. leading P/E?
CFA Level II equity valuation question. I know P/E is price divided by EPS, but the curriculum talks about a 'justified' P/E derived from fundamentals. How does this differ from just looking at a stock's market P/E, and when should I use trailing versus leading versions?
The justified P/E is one of the most elegant connections in CFA equity valuation -- it links the price multiple directly to the company's fundamentals rather than just observing what the market happens to be paying.
Derivation from the Gordon Growth Model
Start with: P0 = D1 / (r - g)
Since D1 = E1 x (1 - b), where b is the retention ratio:
P0 = E1 x (1 - b) / (r - g)
Leading (Forward) Justified P/E:
P0 / E1 = (1 - b) / (r - g)
Trailing Justified P/E:
Since E1 = E0 x (1 + g):
P0 / E0 = (1 - b)(1 + g) / (r - g)
Worked Example: Meridian Software Corp (fictional)
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Payout ratio (1 - b) | 40% |
| Required return (r) | 11% |
| Sustainable growth (g) | 6% |
| Current EPS (E0) | $3.20 |
Leading justified P/E = 0.40 / (0.11 - 0.06) = 0.40 / 0.05 = 8.0x
Trailing justified P/E = 0.40 x 1.06 / (0.11 - 0.06) = 0.424 / 0.05 = 8.48x
Justified price = 8.0 x E1 = 8.0 x ($3.20 x 1.06) = 8.0 x $3.39 = $27.14
Or equivalently: 8.48 x $3.20 = $27.14 (same answer either way)
Trailing vs. Leading -- When to Use Each
| Scenario | Use | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing to market consensus estimates | Leading P/E | Analysts report forward estimates |
| Company with volatile or cyclical earnings | Leading P/E | Historical EPS may be misleading |
| Stable mature company | Either works | Earnings are predictable |
| Comparing across sectors with different fiscal years | Leading P/E | Normalizes timing differences |
The Power of Justified P/E
If Meridian's actual market P/E is 12x but the justified P/E is only 8x, the stock appears overvalued -- the market is paying more than fundamentals warrant. Conversely, a market P/E of 6x against a justified 8x signals undervaluation.
Sensitivity Analysis: The justified P/E is extremely sensitive to the spread (r - g). If g increases from 6% to 7% while r stays at 11%, the leading P/E jumps from 8.0x to 10.0x -- a 25% increase from just a 1% change in growth. This is why small changes in growth assumptions can dramatically swing valuations.
For more on multiples-based valuation, explore our CFA Level II equity materials.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.