How do you use market multiples for cross-border equity comparisons?
I'm studying equity valuation for CFA Level II. When comparing P/E ratios across countries, the numbers seem meaningless because of different accounting standards, growth rates, and risk levels. How do you make cross-border multiple comparisons meaningful?
Cross-border multiple comparisons are tricky but essential in global equity analysis. The key is understanding WHY multiples differ across countries and adjusting accordingly.
Why multiples differ across borders:
- Accounting standards — IFRS vs. US GAAP treatment of R&D, leases, goodwill, and revenue recognition creates different earnings figures for economically similar companies
- Growth expectations — Higher expected growth justifies higher P/E ratios
- Risk (discount rates) — Country risk, currency risk, and political risk affect required returns
- Industry mix — A country's market-level P/E is driven by its sector composition
- Inflation — Higher inflation tends to depress real P/E ratios
- Tax differences — Corporate tax rates affect after-tax earnings
Adjustments for comparability:
| Issue | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| IFRS vs. GAAP earnings | Restate to common accounting basis |
| Different tax rates | Use pre-tax multiples (EV/EBIT) |
| Capital structure differences | Use EV/EBITDA instead of P/E |
| Cyclicality | Use normalized or Shiller P/E |
| Currency effects | Express in common currency or use local multiples |
Example: Comparing Nippon Steel Corp (Japan, IFRS) vs. Cascade Steel Inc. (US, GAAP):
- Nippon trades at P/E of 8x; Cascade at P/E of 14x
- But Japan's steel industry has lower growth expectations (1% vs. 3%)
- Nippon capitalizes more development costs under IFRS, boosting earnings
- Adjusting Nippon's earnings to GAAP basis raises its P/E to 10x
- Adjusting for growth differential (using PEG ratio): Nippon PEG = 10x/1% = 10; Cascade PEG = 14x/3% = 4.7
- Cascade is actually cheaper on a growth-adjusted basis
Preferred multiples for cross-border:
- EV/EBITDA — Minimizes accounting and capital structure distortions
- Price/Book — Useful for financial institutions but sensitive to accounting
- EV/Revenue — Most comparable when earnings are distorted
- PEG ratio — Adjusts P/E for growth differences
Exam tip: The CFA exam often asks why a company in one country has a higher P/E than a similar company in another country. Be prepared to discuss accounting differences, growth, and risk as explanatory factors.
Practice equity valuation in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.