A
AcadiFi
CL
CFA_L2_Grinder2026-04-09
cfaLevel IIEquity Valuation

P/E vs. EV/EBITDA: when should I use each multiple and what are the pitfalls?

I'm confused about relative valuation multiples in CFA Level II. Both P/E and EV/EBITDA are commonly used, but they seem to give different answers. When is one more appropriate than the other, and what adjustments should I make before comparing multiples across companies?

176 upvotes
AcadiFi TeamVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

Relative valuation using price multiples is one of the most practical skills tested in CFA Level II. Understanding when to use P/E vs. EV/EBITDA — and their pitfalls — is essential.

P/E Ratio (Price-to-Earnings):

$$P/E = \frac{\text{Price per Share}}{\text{EPS}}$$

Measures what the market pays per dollar of earnings to equity holders.

EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to EBITDA):

$$EV/EBITDA = \frac{\text{Market Cap + Debt - Cash}}{\text{EBITDA}}$$

Measures what the market values the entire firm at per dollar of operating cash proxy.

Key Differences:

FeatureP/EEV/EBITDA
NumeratorEquity value onlyTotal firm value
DenominatorAfter interest & taxBefore interest, tax, D&A
Capital structure effectAffected by leverageLargely neutral
Depreciation effectAffectedExcluded
Negative earningsMeaninglessCan still work
Tax regime differencesDistortedLess distorted

When to Use Each:

Use P/E when:

  • Comparing companies with similar leverage
  • Earnings are positive and stable
  • Companies in the same tax jurisdiction
  • Valuing mature, profitable businesses

Use EV/EBITDA when:

  • Comparing companies with different capital structures
  • Companies have different depreciation policies or asset ages
  • Earnings are negative but EBITDA is positive
  • Cross-border comparisons (different tax rates)
  • Capital-intensive industries (telecom, utilities, manufacturing)

Worked Example: Comparing Two Retailers

MetricAshwood RetailBirchfield Stores
Share Price$64$38
EPS$4.00$2.50
Shares Outstanding50M80M
Market Cap$3,200M$3,040M
Debt$1,800M$400M
Cash$200M$150M
EV$4,800M$3,290M
EBITDA$480M$380M
  • Ashwood P/E = 64/4.00 = 16.0x
  • Birchfield P/E = 38/2.50 = 15.2x
  • Ashwood EV/EBITDA = 4,800/480 = 10.0x
  • Birchfield EV/EBITDA = 3,290/380 = 8.7x

On P/E, the companies look similar. But EV/EBITDA reveals Ashwood trades at a meaningful premium. The difference? Ashwood has much more debt, which reduces EPS through interest expense, making P/E misleadingly comparable.

Common Pitfalls:

  1. Comparing P/E across different leverage levels — distorts comparison
  2. Using trailing P/E for cyclical companies — earnings at peak inflate P/E at trough
  3. Ignoring adjustments — one-time items, stock compensation, lease differences
  4. EV/EBITDA ignoring capex — high capex companies may be overvalued on EV/EBITDA

Exam Tip: If the question mentions companies with different capital structures or D&A policies, EV/EBITDA is the right choice. If both are mature, stable, low-leverage businesses, P/E works fine.

Practice relative valuation analysis with our CFA Level II question bank on AcadiFi.

📊

Master Level II with our CFA Course

107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction

#pe-ratio#ev-ebitda#relative-valuation#price-multiples#enterprise-value