P/E vs. EV/EBITDA: when should I use each multiple and what are the pitfalls?
I'm confused about relative valuation multiples in CFA Level II. Both P/E and EV/EBITDA are commonly used, but they seem to give different answers. When is one more appropriate than the other, and what adjustments should I make before comparing multiples across companies?
Relative valuation using price multiples is one of the most practical skills tested in CFA Level II. Understanding when to use P/E vs. EV/EBITDA — and their pitfalls — is essential.
P/E Ratio (Price-to-Earnings):
$$P/E = \frac{\text{Price per Share}}{\text{EPS}}$$
Measures what the market pays per dollar of earnings to equity holders.
EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to EBITDA):
$$EV/EBITDA = \frac{\text{Market Cap + Debt - Cash}}{\text{EBITDA}}$$
Measures what the market values the entire firm at per dollar of operating cash proxy.
Key Differences:
| Feature | P/E | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|
| Numerator | Equity value only | Total firm value |
| Denominator | After interest & tax | Before interest, tax, D&A |
| Capital structure effect | Affected by leverage | Largely neutral |
| Depreciation effect | Affected | Excluded |
| Negative earnings | Meaningless | Can still work |
| Tax regime differences | Distorted | Less distorted |
When to Use Each:
Use P/E when:
- Comparing companies with similar leverage
- Earnings are positive and stable
- Companies in the same tax jurisdiction
- Valuing mature, profitable businesses
Use EV/EBITDA when:
- Comparing companies with different capital structures
- Companies have different depreciation policies or asset ages
- Earnings are negative but EBITDA is positive
- Cross-border comparisons (different tax rates)
- Capital-intensive industries (telecom, utilities, manufacturing)
Worked Example: Comparing Two Retailers
| Metric | Ashwood Retail | Birchfield Stores |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price | $64 | $38 |
| EPS | $4.00 | $2.50 |
| Shares Outstanding | 50M | 80M |
| Market Cap | $3,200M | $3,040M |
| Debt | $1,800M | $400M |
| Cash | $200M | $150M |
| EV | $4,800M | $3,290M |
| EBITDA | $480M | $380M |
- Ashwood P/E = 64/4.00 = 16.0x
- Birchfield P/E = 38/2.50 = 15.2x
- Ashwood EV/EBITDA = 4,800/480 = 10.0x
- Birchfield EV/EBITDA = 3,290/380 = 8.7x
On P/E, the companies look similar. But EV/EBITDA reveals Ashwood trades at a meaningful premium. The difference? Ashwood has much more debt, which reduces EPS through interest expense, making P/E misleadingly comparable.
Common Pitfalls:
- Comparing P/E across different leverage levels — distorts comparison
- Using trailing P/E for cyclical companies — earnings at peak inflate P/E at trough
- Ignoring adjustments — one-time items, stock compensation, lease differences
- EV/EBITDA ignoring capex — high capex companies may be overvalued on EV/EBITDA
Exam Tip: If the question mentions companies with different capital structures or D&A policies, EV/EBITDA is the right choice. If both are mature, stable, low-leverage businesses, P/E works fine.
Practice relative valuation analysis with our CFA Level II question bank on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.