How does a pension plan curtailment affect the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the income statement?
I came across a CFA Level II question where a company significantly reduced the number of employees covered by its defined benefit plan. The answer mentioned a 'curtailment' that reduced the PBO and created a gain. How exactly does curtailment accounting work?
A pension curtailment occurs when an employer significantly reduces the expected years of future service of current employees (e.g., through mass layoffs) or eliminates the accrual of benefits for a significant number of employees for all or some of their future services (e.g., freezing the pension plan).
Effect on PBO:
A curtailment generally reduces the PBO because fewer (or no) future benefits will accrue. The reduction creates a curtailment gain (or sometimes a loss if termination benefits are enhanced).
Accounting Treatment (IAS 19 / ASC 715):
Under IAS 19 (revised), curtailment gains and losses are recognized immediately in profit or loss in the period the curtailment occurs.
Under ASC 715 (US GAAP), the treatment is similar — curtailment gains/losses are recognized when the curtailment event occurs and the effects are estimable.
Components of a Curtailment Gain/Loss:
- Change in PBO — the reduction in the present value of future benefits
- Recognition of unrecognized items — any prior service cost (from plan amendments) related to the curtailed benefits must be immediately recognized in P&L
Worked Example — Sterling Industries:
Sterling announces it will freeze its defined benefit plan, eliminating all future benefit accruals for its 1,200 participants.
| Item | Before Curtailment | After Curtailment | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBO | $185,000,000 | $152,000,000 | ($33,000,000) |
| Plan assets | $140,000,000 | $140,000,000 | $0 |
| Funded status | ($45,000,000) | ($12,000,000) | +$33,000,000 |
Additionally, Sterling has $8,000,000 of unrecognized prior service cost in AOCI related to a 2023 plan amendment.
Curtailment Gain Calculation:
- Reduction in PBO: $33,000,000 (gain)
- Less: Immediate recognition of prior service cost: ($8,000,000) (loss)
- Net curtailment gain: $25,000,000
Journal Entry:
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| PBO | $33,000,000 | |
| AOCI — Prior Service Cost | $8,000,000 | |
| Curtailment Gain (P&L) | $25,000,000 |
Analytical Implications:
- One-time gain — the $25M gain significantly boosts reported income but is non-recurring. Analysts typically exclude it from normalized earnings.
- Improved funded status — the funded status improves by $33M, reducing the net pension liability on the balance sheet.
- Future pension expense drops — with no future accruals, service cost goes to zero. The only remaining pension cost is interest on the existing PBO minus expected return on plan assets.
- Strategic motivation — companies sometimes curtail plans specifically to reduce balance sheet liabilities and boost short-term earnings.
Key Exam Points:
- Curtailment gains/losses are recognized immediately in P&L.
- Unrecognized prior service cost related to curtailed benefits must also be immediately recognized.
- Curtailment vs. settlement: curtailment reduces future benefit accruals; settlement eliminates the obligation entirely (e.g., lump-sum payouts).
- The PBO reduction from curtailment is separate from any actuarial gains/losses.
Practice more pension scenarios in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.