What is the difference between IRR and MOIC in private equity, and why can IRR be misleading?
I'm studying PE performance measurement for CFA Level II. My materials mention IRR, MOIC (multiple on invested capital), TVPI, and DPI. How are these different, and why do PE firms sometimes focus on IRR when MOIC might tell a different story?
PE performance measurement uses multiple metrics because no single number tells the whole story. Understanding each metric's strengths and weaknesses is critical for CFA Level II.
Key Metrics:
1. IRR (Internal Rate of Return):
- The discount rate that makes the NPV of all cash flows (capital calls and distributions) equal to zero
- Time-weighted — penalizes late returns, rewards early returns
- Industry standard for PE performance reporting
2. MOIC (Multiple on Invested Capital) / TVPI (Total Value to Paid-In):
- TVPI = (Distributions + Remaining NAV) / Total Capital Called
- Ignores the time dimension entirely
- A 2.0x MOIC means the fund returned 1 invested
3. DPI (Distributions to Paid-In):
- DPI = Distributions / Total Capital Called
- Only counts actual cash returned (ignores unrealized NAV)
- Called the 'realization ratio'
4. RVPI (Residual Value to Paid-In):
- RVPI = Remaining NAV / Total Capital Called
- Represents unrealized value still in the fund
- TVPI = DPI + RVPI
Why IRR Can Be Misleading:
Example — Two PE Funds:
| Metric | Ridgecrest Fund A | Ridgecrest Fund B |
|---|---|---|
| Capital called | $100M | $100M |
| Total distributions | $180M | $250M |
| Fund life | 4 years | 8 years |
| IRR | 18.9% | 12.1% |
| MOIC | 1.80x | 2.50x |
Fund A has a higher IRR (18.9% vs 12.1%) because it returned capital faster. But Fund B generated more total wealth (2.50x vs 1.80x). Which is better? It depends on the LP's situation:
- If the LP can reinvest distributions at 18.9%, Fund A's higher IRR is genuinely better
- If reinvestment opportunities only yield 6%, Fund B's higher MOIC creates more total wealth
How IRR Can Be Manipulated:
- Subscription credit lines: GP borrows at the fund level before calling capital from LPs, making the capital call later and inflating IRR
- Early exits: Selling the easiest wins first to show a high early IRR during fundraising for the next fund
- Timing of capital calls: Delaying calls until just before a distribution boosts IRR
Loading diagram...
Best Practice: Sophisticated LPs look at all four metrics together:
- High IRR + High MOIC = genuine outperformance
- High IRR + Low MOIC = fast returns but limited wealth creation
- Low IRR + High MOIC = patience rewarded with large total returns
- High DPI = cash has actually been returned (not just paper gains)
Exam tip: CFA Level II frequently presents cash flow timelines for a PE fund and asks you to calculate or interpret IRR vs. MOIC. Be prepared to explain why two funds can rank differently on IRR vs. MOIC and why subscription credit lines inflate IRR without increasing MOIC.
For more on PE performance measurement, explore our CFA Level II alternatives course on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.