When must a company recognize a provision under IAS 37, and how is the provision measured?
I keep mixing up provisions, contingent liabilities, and contingent assets for CFA Level I. A practice question asked whether a company should recognize a provision for a pending lawsuit where the legal team said there was a 60% chance of losing $2 million. I got it wrong because I wasn't sure if 60% meets the 'probable' threshold. Can someone clarify the recognition rules?
IAS 37 draws a clear line between provisions that are recognized on the balance sheet and contingent liabilities that are only disclosed. The three recognition criteria must ALL be met simultaneously.
Recognition Criteria:
A provision is recognized when:
- Present obligation — the entity has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event
- Probable outflow — it is probable (more likely than not, i.e., >50%) that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation
- Reliable estimate — a reliable estimate of the amount can be made
Your lawsuit example:
Sentinel Corp is defending a product liability claim. Legal counsel estimates a 60% probability of losing and paying $2 million.
- Present obligation? Yes — the alleged defective product was sold (past event).
- Probable outflow? Yes — 60% > 50% threshold under IFRS.
- Reliable estimate? Yes — $2 million is the estimated settlement.
All three criteria met = Recognize a provision of $2,000,000
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Litigation Expense (or Loss) | $2,000,000 | |
| Provision for Litigation | $2,000,000 |
Loading diagram...
IFRS vs US GAAP threshold:
This is critical for the exam:
| Standard | "Probable" Means | Typical Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| IFRS (IAS 37) | More likely than not | >50% |
| US GAAP (ASC 450) | Likely to occur | ~70-80% |
So a 60% probability triggers a provision under IFRS but likely would NOT under US GAAP — it would only be disclosed as a contingent liability.
Measurement:
- Best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the reporting date.
- For a large population of items (e.g., warranty claims), use the expected value (probability-weighted average).
- For a single obligation (like a lawsuit), use the most likely outcome.
- If the time value of money is material, the provision is measured at its present value, with the unwinding of the discount recognized as a finance cost.
Contingent liabilities (disclosed only):
If the probability is possible (not probable) — say 30-40% under IFRS — no provision is recognized. Instead, the company discloses the nature, estimated financial effect, and uncertainties in the footnotes.
Contingent assets:
These are NEVER recognized. If the inflow is probable, it is disclosed. If virtually certain, it is recognized as an asset (but then it is no longer "contingent").
Exam tip: When a question describes a possible future payment, immediately ask: (1) Is there a present obligation from a past event? (2) Is outflow probable? (3) Can I estimate it? If all three are yes, book the provision.
Explore more IAS 37 scenarios in our CFA Level I FRA question bank.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.