How does Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) explain exchange rate movements, and does it actually work?
I'm studying CFA Level I Economics and PPP seems elegantly simple — exchange rates should adjust so that identical goods cost the same in every country. But does this actually hold in practice? And what's the difference between absolute and relative PPP?
Purchasing Power Parity is one of the most important (and most debated) exchange rate theories. It works well as a long-run anchor but poorly for short-term predictions.
Absolute PPP
A basket of goods should cost the same in every country when converted to a common currency:
S(A/B) = Price Level in Country A / Price Level in Country B
If a basket costs $100 in the US and EUR80 in Germany:
S(USD/EUR) = 100/80 = 1.25 USD per EUR
Relative PPP
More practically useful. It says the exchange rate should change by the inflation differential:
% Change in S(A/B) = Inflation_A - Inflation_B
Example — Marston Analytics Currency Forecast
Marston's economist forecasts for the next year:
- US inflation: 3.5%
- UK inflation: 2.0%
- Current spot rate: 1.28 USD/GBP
Relative PPP prediction:
% Change in USD/GBP = 3.5% - 2.0% = +1.5%
Expected future rate = 1.28 x (1.015) = 1.299 USD/GBP
The USD is expected to depreciate by 1.5% against the GBP because the US has higher inflation — US goods are becoming relatively more expensive, so the dollar weakens.
Does PPP Work in Practice?
| Time Horizon | Accuracy | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Short term (< 1 year) | Very poor | Capital flows, speculation, and monetary policy dominate |
| Medium term (1-5 years) | Moderate | Other factors still important |
| Long term (5-20 years) | Reasonably good | Inflation differentials accumulate and dominate |
Why PPP Fails in the Short Run:
- Capital flows — Investment flows (not trade flows) dominate currency markets. A country with high interest rates attracts capital, strengthening its currency regardless of inflation.
- Non-traded goods — Haircuts, rent, and local services can't be arbitraged across borders. They comprise 50%+ of most price indices.
- Trade barriers — Tariffs, transportation costs, and regulations prevent goods prices from equalizing.
- Sticky prices — Companies don't change prices instantly when exchange rates move.
- Balassa-Samuelson effect — Productivity differences between traded and non-traded sectors cause real exchange rate deviations in developing countries.
The Big Mac Index (Informal PPP Test):
The Economist's Big Mac Index compares burger prices globally. If a Big Mac costs $5.50 in the US and CHF 6.50 in Switzerland, the implied PPP rate is 6.50/5.50 = 1.18 CHF/USD. If the actual rate is 0.88 CHF/USD, the Swiss franc is 'overvalued' by about 34% relative to PPP.
Exam Tip: CFA Level I often asks you to calculate the expected exchange rate under relative PPP given two inflation rates. Remember: the higher-inflation currency depreciates. Be careful with the currency quotation convention (which currency is in the numerator).
Study exchange rate models in our CFA Level I Economics course.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.