What drives long-term real exchange rate movements, and what is the Balassa-Samuelson effect?
My CFA Level II study materials discuss real exchange rate trends that persist for decades. I understand nominal rates, but what causes real exchange rates to trend rather than revert to PPP? The Balassa-Samuelson effect comes up a lot but I can't quite grasp the mechanism.
Real exchange rates can deviate from PPP for extended periods due to structural economic differences. The Balassa-Samuelson effect is the most important explanation.
Real Exchange Rate Defined:
The real exchange rate adjusts the nominal rate for price level differences:
q(d/f) = S(d/f) x (P_foreign / P_domestic)
If q = 1, PPP holds perfectly. Deviations from 1 indicate currency misalignment in purchasing power terms.
The Balassa-Samuelson Effect:
This explains why currencies of faster-growing economies tend to appreciate in real terms. The mechanism:
- Productivity growth in tradeable goods (manufacturing, tech) tends to be faster in rapidly developing countries
- Wages in the tradeable sector rise with productivity
- Wages in the non-tradeable sector (services, government) also rise because workers can switch sectors
- But productivity in services hasn't increased, so higher wages mean higher service prices
- The overall price level rises faster than in slower-growing countries
- If the nominal exchange rate doesn't fully depreciate, the real exchange rate appreciates
Example:
Consider Meridia, a fast-growing emerging market:
- Manufacturing productivity grows 6% per year (vs. 2% in the US)
- Service sector productivity grows 1% per year in both countries
- Wages in Meridia rise 5% across all sectors (pulled up by manufacturing)
- Service prices in Meridia rise ~4% per year (wage growth minus low productivity growth)
- US service prices rise ~1% per year
- Meridia's CPI rises 3% more than US CPI
- The Meridian peso appreciates ~3% per year in real terms
Other Drivers of Real Exchange Rate Trends:
| Factor | Direction | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Balassa-Samuelson | Appreciation for high-growth countries | China 2005-2015 |
| Terms of trade | Appreciation for commodity exporters when prices rise | Australia during mining boom |
| Government spending | Appreciation if spending falls on non-tradables | — |
| Net foreign assets | Appreciation for creditor nations | Japan, Switzerland |
Investment Implications:
At Pinnacle Global Asset Management, an analyst forecasting the Chinese yuan must distinguish between:
- Nominal depreciation (if China has higher inflation than the US) implied by PPP
- Real appreciation driven by Balassa-Samuelson (productivity convergence)
The net nominal exchange rate movement depends on which force dominates.
Exam tip: CFA Level II often asks whether a country's real exchange rate is expected to appreciate or depreciate. Look for clues about relative productivity growth rates, terms of trade changes, and fiscal policy. The Balassa-Samuelson effect means fast-growing EM currencies should appreciate in real terms even if PPP suggests depreciation.
Explore more international economics topics in our CFA Level II course on AcadiFi.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
What exactly is the Capital Market Expectations (CME) framework and why does it matter for asset allocation?
How do business cycle phases affect asset class return expectations?
Can someone explain the Grinold–Kroner model step by step with numbers?
How do you forecast fixed-income returns using the building-blocks approach?
PPP vs Interest Rate Parity for forecasting exchange rates — when do I use which?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.