When should I use forward P/E versus trailing P/E in comparable analysis?
For CFA Level II relative valuation, I'm always second-guessing whether to use trailing or forward earnings in the P/E multiple. My study group argues about this constantly. What are the rules of thumb, and how do analysts in practice decide?
The choice between forward and trailing P/E depends on what you are trying to capture and the quality of available data.
Definitions:
- Trailing P/E = Price / Earnings per share over the last 12 months (LTM)
- Forward P/E = Price / Consensus forecast EPS for the next 12 months (NTM)
Key Differences:
| Feature | Trailing P/E | Forward P/E |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Actual reported earnings | Analyst estimates |
| Reliability | Objective (audited) | Subjective (forecast) |
| Timeliness | Backward-looking | Forward-looking |
| Growth capture | Misses future changes | Reflects expected trends |
| Availability | Always available | Requires analyst coverage |
Loading diagram...
When to Use Forward P/E (Generally Preferred):
-
Valuation is forward-looking by nature. You buy a stock for future earnings, not past ones. A company trading at 30x trailing but 18x forward may be fairly valued if earnings are accelerating.
-
Significant earnings change expected. If Oakfield Semiconductor (fictional) earned 3.50 NTM due to a product launch:
- Trailing P/E at $70 = 35.0x (looks expensive)
- Forward P/E at $70 = 20.0x (more reasonable)
-
Industry standard. Most sell-side equity research uses forward P/E as the primary metric.
-
Comparable analysis. When comparing peers, forward P/E normalizes for different fiscal year-ends and one-time charges in historical periods.
When to Use Trailing P/E:
-
No analyst coverage — small caps, micro caps, and some international stocks lack consensus estimates
-
Forecasts are unreliable — high forecast dispersion, turnarounds, or companies with volatile earnings make forward estimates questionable
-
Screening and historical comparisons — trailing P/E is useful for quantitative screens because it is objective and consistently calculated
-
Cyclical peak/trough detection — comparing trailing P/E to historical average trailing P/E helps identify where we are in the cycle
Practical Illustration:
Comparing three media companies at the same price ($50/share):
| Company | Trailing EPS | Forward EPS | Trailing P/E | Forward P/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belmont Media | $3.00 | $3.80 | 16.7x | 13.2x |
| Hargrove Studios | $4.50 | $4.20 | 11.1x | 11.9x |
| Ridgeway Digital | $2.00 | $4.00 | 25.0x | 12.5x |
Using trailing P/E, Hargrove looks cheapest. But Hargrove's forward EPS is declining (margin pressure?), while Ridgeway is doubling. On forward P/E, Ridgeway is actually the cheapest.
Academic evidence: Research shows that forward P/E has better predictive power for future stock returns than trailing P/E, because it incorporates the most current information about earnings trajectory.
Exam tip: CFA Level II vignettes will often provide both trailing and forward data. If the question asks which metric is more appropriate for the given scenario, look for clues: anticipated earnings changes, one-time items in LTM earnings, or lack of analyst coverage.
Practice relative valuation in our CFA Level II question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.