How does the revaluation surplus for land and buildings work under IFRS, and what goes to OCI vs. profit or loss?
I'm confused about the revaluation model under IAS 16. When a company revalues its land and buildings upward, I know the gain goes to OCI as a revaluation surplus. But what happens if the same asset was previously written down? And what if the fair value later drops below original cost? The rules about recycling between OCI and P&L are tripping me up.
The revaluation model under IAS 16 follows a specific hierarchy that depends on whether the asset was previously written down. Let me walk through the three scenarios with a single asset.
Setup: Brookfield Properties owns a warehouse purchased for 600,000. Carrying value = $2,400,000.
Scenario A: First-time revaluation upward
Fair value at Dec 31, 2025 = $2,900,000.
Revaluation gain = 2,400,000 = $500,000
Since there was no prior impairment, the entire gain goes to OCI and is accumulated in equity as a revaluation surplus:
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Warehouse (carrying value increase) | $500,000 | |
| Revaluation Surplus (OCI / Equity) | $500,000 |
Scenario B: Subsequent revaluation downward (still above original depreciated cost)
One year later (Dec 31, 2026), fair value drops to 2,800,000.
Revaluation decrease = 2,550,000 = $250,000
This decrease is first charged against the existing revaluation surplus in OCI:
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Revaluation Surplus (OCI / Equity) | $250,000 | |
| Warehouse (carrying value decrease) | $250,000 |
Remaining revaluation surplus = 250,000 = $250,000.
Scenario C: Revaluation drops below original depreciated cost
Assume fair value falls further to 2,550,000, and remaining revaluation surplus is $250,000.
Total decrease = 2,000,000 = $550,000
- First $250,000 is charged against the revaluation surplus (OCI) — exhausting it.
- Remaining $300,000 is recognized as a loss in profit or loss.
Loading diagram...
Key rules:
- Asset-by-asset basis — you cannot offset a revaluation surplus on Building A against a loss on Building B.
- No recycling — the revaluation surplus is never "recycled" through profit or loss when the asset is sold. Instead, it is transferred directly from revaluation surplus to retained earnings upon disposal.
- Land is not depreciated — so after revaluation, land simply sits at the new fair value until the next revaluation. Buildings continue to be depreciated on the revalued amount.
- Entire class — if you revalue one building, you must revalue the entire class of assets (all land, or all buildings).
Exam tip: US GAAP does NOT permit the revaluation model for PP&E. This is an IFRS-only treatment and a classic CFA Level I GAAP vs. IFRS comparison question.
Explore more IAS 16 scenarios in our CFA Level I FRA practice materials.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.