A
AcadiFi
CA
CIA_Aspirant_20262026-04-07
cfaLevel IIFinancial Reporting & Analysis

How do estimated vs. actual forfeitures of stock options affect compensation expense, and what is a true-up adjustment?

I'm confused about forfeiture accounting for CFA Level II. I know companies estimate how many options will be forfeited and adjust the expense, but what happens when the actual forfeitures differ from the estimate? Is there a true-up? And does the approach differ between IFRS and US GAAP?

96 upvotes
Verified ExpertVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

Forfeiture accounting determines how many option grants are expected to vest, directly affecting total compensation expense. The treatment differs subtly between IFRS and US GAAP.

US GAAP (ASC 718):

Companies have a policy election (since ASU 2016-09):

  • Option 1: Estimate forfeitures at grant date and adjust for actual forfeitures as they occur (true-up approach)
  • Option 2: Recognize forfeitures as they actually occur (no estimation)

IFRS 2:

  • Companies MUST estimate expected forfeitures and revise the estimate at each reporting date. No option to recognize as they occur.

How the Estimation Works:

At each reporting date, the company revises its estimate of the number of awards expected to vest. The cumulative compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the revised estimate — this is the true-up.

Worked Example — Keystone Dynamics:

On January 1, 2024, Keystone grants 200,000 stock options to 100 employees (2,000 each). Grant-date fair value: $15/option. 3-year cliff vesting.

Estimated forfeiture rate: 5% per year

Expected to vest: 200,000 × (1 − 0.05)^3 = 200,000 × 0.8574 = 171,475 options

Total expected compensation: 171,475 × $15 = $2,572,125

Year 1:

Expense = $2,572,125 / 3 = $857,375

Actual departures: 3 employees (6,000 options forfeited)

Year 1 True-Up:

Revised estimate: 97 employees remain. New forfeiture estimate revised to 4%/year for remaining 2 years:

Expected to vest: 97 × 2,000 × (1 − 0.04)^2 = 194,000 × 0.9216 = 178,790 options

Revised total expense: 178,790 × $15 = $2,681,850

Year 1 cumulative expense should be: $2,681,850 / 3 = $893,950

Already recognized: $857,375

True-up adjustment in Year 1: $893,950 − $857,375 = $36,575 additional expense

Year 2:

Target cumulative = $2,681,850 × 2/3 = $1,787,900

Already recognized: $893,950

Year 2 expense = $1,787,900 − $893,950 = $893,950

(If another revision is needed based on Year 2 departures, another true-up occurs.)

Year 3 — Vesting Date:

Actual vesting: 90 employees × 2,000 = 180,000 options

Final total expense: 180,000 × $15 = $2,700,000

Previously recognized (cumulative): $1,787,900

Year 3 expense = $2,700,000 − $1,787,900 = $912,100

Impact on Financial Analysis:

  1. True-up adjustments create P&L volatility — a sudden increase in forfeitures can reduce expense, while lower-than-expected forfeitures increase it
  2. Under the no-estimation election (US GAAP), expense is reversed when forfeitures occur, creating more period-to-period variability
  3. Companies with high employee turnover will have more significant forfeiture adjustments

Key Exam Points:

  1. IFRS requires estimation; US GAAP allows a policy choice.
  2. True-up adjustments are prospective — they affect current and future periods, not prior periods.
  3. At vesting date, cumulative expense = actual awards vested × grant-date fair value.
  4. The total expense over the vesting period reflects actual forfeitures regardless of the estimation method used.

Practice forfeiture scenarios in our CFA Level II question bank.

📊

Master Level II with our CFA Course

107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction

#forfeiture-estimation#true-up#share-based-compensation#ifrs-2#asc-718