How do I run an accretion/dilution test for a share buyback, and when does a buyback actually increase EPS?
I'm studying CFA Level I equity and the concept of share buybacks and their EPS impact. I've heard that a buyback is 'accretive' if it increases EPS and 'dilutive' if it decreases EPS. But how do I actually test this? Is there a simple rule to determine whether a company should buy back shares?
The accretion/dilution framework for buybacks is elegant once you see the underlying logic. The key insight is that when a company uses cash to repurchase shares, it gives up the earnings on that cash (opportunity cost) but reduces the share count.
The Rule: A buyback is accretive to EPS if the earnings yield (E/P) of the stock exceeds the after-tax cost of financing the buyback.
- If funded with cash: Compare E/P to the after-tax return on cash
- If funded with debt: Compare E/P to the after-tax cost of debt
Worked Example: Harborview Industries has:
- Net income: $240M
- Shares outstanding: 80M
- Current EPS: $3.00
- Share price: $40
- Earnings yield: 40 = 7.5%
- Cash earns 4% pre-tax, tax rate 25%, so after-tax cash yield = 3.0%
Harborview uses 40.
After Buyback:
- Lost after-tax cash income: 6M
- New net income: 6M = $234M
- New shares: 80M - 5M = 75M
- New EPS: 3.12**
EPS rose from 3.12 — the buyback is accretive because the earnings yield (7.5%) exceeded the after-tax cash yield (3.0%).
Quick Decision Rule:
| Earnings Yield vs. Financing Cost | EPS Impact |
|---|---|
| E/P > after-tax financing cost | Accretive (EPS increases) |
| E/P < after-tax financing cost | Dilutive (EPS decreases) |
| E/P = after-tax financing cost | Neutral |
Exam Tip: The CFA exam may present a scenario where a company funds a buyback with debt. If the after-tax cost of debt is 4% and the earnings yield is 6%, the buyback is still accretive. Always compare E/P to the after-tax cost, not the pre-tax cost.
Practice more buyback scenarios in our CFA Level I question bank.
Master Level I with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.