How do you derive the sustainable growth rate from the DuPont identity, and how does it connect to valuation?
I'm working through CFA Level II equity valuation and the sustainable growth rate (SGR) keeps coming up in DDM questions. I understand g = b x ROE at a high level, but my instructor says you can decompose it further using DuPont. Can someone show the full derivation with a worked example?
The sustainable growth rate is the maximum rate a company can grow earnings without issuing new equity or changing its capital structure. It's foundational for any dividend discount model. Let me build the full derivation.
Starting Point
g = b x ROE
Where b = retention ratio = 1 - dividend payout ratio.
DuPont Decomposition of ROE
The 5-factor DuPont breaks ROE into:
ROE = (Net Income / EBT) x (EBT / EBIT) x (EBIT / Revenue) x (Revenue / Assets) x (Assets / Equity)
Or more commonly the 3-factor version:
ROE = Net Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Equity Multiplier
ROE = (NI/Sales) x (Sales/Assets) x (Assets/Equity)
Therefore:
g = b x (NI/Sales) x (Sales/Assets) x (Assets/Equity)
Loading diagram...
Worked Example: Castleton Industries (fictional)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Net income | $48 million |
| Sales | $320 million |
| Total assets | $400 million |
| Total equity | $200 million |
| Dividends paid | $12 million |
Step 1: Retention ratio = 1 - (12/48) = 1 - 0.25 = 0.75
Step 2: Net profit margin = 48/320 = 15.0%
Step 3: Asset turnover = 320/400 = 0.80x
Step 4: Equity multiplier = 400/200 = 2.00x
Step 5: ROE = 15.0% x 0.80 x 2.00 = 24.0%
Step 6: g = 0.75 x 24.0% = 18.0%
Connection to Valuation
In the Gordon Growth Model: P0 = D1 / (r - g). If Castleton pays D0 = $0.50 per share and the required return is 22%, then:
D1 = 0.59
P0 = 0.59 / 0.04 = $14.75
Critical Insight for Exams: If a company increases leverage (higher equity multiplier), ROE rises and so does the sustainable growth rate -- but this also increases financial risk, which should increase the required return r. Students often forget that changing one DuPont component has ripple effects on valuation through both numerator and denominator.
Practice more DuPont problems in our CFA question bank.
Master Level II with our CFA Course
107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction
Related Questions
Why does an early retirement provision lower risk tolerance but high turnover does not — both reduce liabilities, right?
Why does it matter if the pension fund is invested in stocks similar to the sponsor's business?
What is the rule about active vs retired lives and pension plan duration?
Why does the textbook recommend 100% equities for a young employee? That sounds extremely aggressive.
I run my own startup. My income is volatile and tied to my industry. Should I hold ZERO equities in my financial accounts?
Join the Discussion
Ask questions and get expert answers.