A
AcadiFi
ES
EquityResearch_Sam2026-04-06
cfaLevel IIEquity ValuationDCF Analysis

Gordon growth model vs. exit multiple — which terminal value method should I use?

CFA Level II presents two approaches for terminal value in a DCF: the Gordon growth model and the exit multiple method. They can give very different answers. When should I use each, and how do I reconcile the difference?

164 upvotes
AcadiFi TeamVerified Expert
AcadiFi Certified Professional

Terminal value (TV) typically represents 60-80% of a company's total DCF value, so this choice matters enormously. Here are both methods and their trade-offs.

Method 1: Gordon Growth Model (Perpetuity Growth)

TV = FCF_n × (1 + g) / (WACC - g)

Assumes free cash flow grows at a constant rate forever after the explicit forecast period.

Strengths:

  • Theoretically sound for stable, mature businesses
  • Does not rely on comparable companies
  • Forces you to think about long-term fundamentals

Weaknesses:

  • Extremely sensitive to g (terminal growth) and WACC
  • Assumes a perpetuity, which may be unrealistic for many businesses
  • g must be ≤ long-term nominal GDP growth (otherwise the company overtakes the economy)

Method 2: Exit Multiple

TV = EBITDA_n × Exit Multiple (or Revenue_n × Exit Multiple)

Assumes the company is sold at the end of the forecast period for a market-based multiple.

Strengths:

  • Grounded in observable market data
  • Easier to benchmark against current trading multiples
  • Less sensitive to a single growth assumption

Weaknesses:

  • Relies on current market conditions (multiples may be elevated or depressed)
  • Circular reasoning if used alongside comparable analysis
  • Assumes comparable companies exist at the terminal date

Example — Horizon Robotics DCF:

  • FCF in Year 5: $80M
  • WACC: 10%
  • Terminal growth: 2.5%
  • Year 5 EBITDA: $120M
  • Peer average EV/EBITDA: 12x
MethodCalculationTerminal Value
Gordon Growth$80M × 1.025 / (0.10 - 0.025)$1,093M
Exit Multiple$120M × 12x$1,440M
Difference32%

Reconciliation approach:

  1. Calculate TV using both methods
  2. If they differ significantly, investigate why:
  • Is the exit multiple implying an unreasonable growth rate? Back-solve: g = WACC - (FCF/TV) = check if it's realistic
  • Are current comparable multiples at a cyclical peak/trough?
  1. Use the average or the method more appropriate for the business

Best practice: Present both in your analysis, explain the assumptions behind each, and let the reader see the range. Many professionals use Gordon Growth as the primary method and cross-check with exit multiples.

Exam tip: CFA Level II may ask you to calculate terminal value using both methods and explain why they differ. Know the implied growth rate formula to back-solve from an exit multiple.

Practice terminal value calculations in our CFA Level II course.

📊

Master Level II with our CFA Course

107 lessons · 200+ hours· Expert instruction

#terminal-value#gordon-growth#exit-multiple#dcf#perpetuity